2020
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00904-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-Year Survey (2014 to 2018) of Azole Resistance in Environmental Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates from China

Abstract: A total of 191 soil samples from Hangzhou, China, were submitted to detect non-wild-type (non-WT) Aspergillus fumigatus and its associated mechanisms. There were 2 (4.7%), 13 (12.4%), and 31 (23.1%) isolates identified as non-WT in 2014, 2016, and 2018, respectively. The resistant mutations of TR34/L98H, TR46/Y121F/T289A, and TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I were found in 3, 5, and 5 non-WT isolates. The G448S mutation, previously only found in clinical settings, was detected in A. fumigatus from soil samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it has become clear that several point mutations causing azole resistance can also be found in environmental isolates. For example, A. fumigatus isolates harbouring single point target gene mutations have been found in the environment including G54A in Germany [ 39 ], G54E in Italy, India, Romania, Tanzania, and Argentina [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], G54R in Switzerland and Thailand [ 44 , 45 ], M220I in Germany [ 39 ], P216L and H285Y in France [ 46 , 47 ], and G448S in China [ 48 ]. Moreover, clinical A. flavus isolates harbouring point mutations conferring Cyp51A P214L (itraconazole and posaconazole resistant) or Cyp51C H349R (pan human azole resistant) alterations displayed cross resistance to imazalil, prochloraz, metconazole, tebuconazole, epoxiconazole, and bromuconazole [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has become clear that several point mutations causing azole resistance can also be found in environmental isolates. For example, A. fumigatus isolates harbouring single point target gene mutations have been found in the environment including G54A in Germany [ 39 ], G54E in Italy, India, Romania, Tanzania, and Argentina [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], G54R in Switzerland and Thailand [ 44 , 45 ], M220I in Germany [ 39 ], P216L and H285Y in France [ 46 , 47 ], and G448S in China [ 48 ]. Moreover, clinical A. flavus isolates harbouring point mutations conferring Cyp51A P214L (itraconazole and posaconazole resistant) or Cyp51C H349R (pan human azole resistant) alterations displayed cross resistance to imazalil, prochloraz, metconazole, tebuconazole, epoxiconazole, and bromuconazole [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi with acquired azole resistance are likely to have a fitness advantage in azole-contaminated environments [ 18 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 ]. In addition, fungi such as mucormycetes that are intrinsically resistant to short-tailed azoles should benefit from a positive selection pressure in azole-rich environments and outcompete azole-susceptible species [ 137 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TR 34 /L98H is a typical TR-type mutation conferring resistance to ITCZ and in some cases to VRCZ, whereas TR 46 /Y121F/T289A confers resistance to VRCZ and in most cases to ITCZ (van Ingen et al, 2015, Buil et al, 2018). Amino acid substitution G448S contributes to resistance to VRCZ and occasionally to ITCZ (Bellete et al, 2010, Toyotome et al, 2016, Cao et al, 2020). Our finding that three strains (3-1-B, 3-1-C, and 3-1-D) showed a higher tolerance to VRCZ and some DMIs than strains with only TR 46 /Y121F/T289A mutation is suggestive of elevation of tolerance to azole drugs by combining mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TR-type mutant strains were spread worldwide. Some isolates from multiple countries were genetically closely related to each other and some had identical microsatellite patterns (Pontes et al, 2020, Cao et al, 2020, Wang et al, 2018, Hagiwara et al, 2016b). Besides such international propagation, intranational clonal expansion was also reported in several countries (Ahangarkani et al, 2020, Chowdhary et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%