1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83293-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five- Year Results of a Prospective and Randomized Study: Experience with Combined Radiotherapy and Surgery of Primary Rectal Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the 19 trials of preoperative RT compared with surgery alone were excluded from the review [12-15]. Preliminary results of one trial have been reported in Russian [12], but the report and results were difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four of the 19 trials of preoperative RT compared with surgery alone were excluded from the review [12-15]. Preliminary results of one trial have been reported in Russian [12], but the report and results were difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trial was excluded until more mature results are available and it is clear that the trial meets the inclusion criteria. Three trials [13-15] had major violations to the inclusion criteria. The Memorial Hospital trial included both randomized as well as non-randomized patients in the analysis [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Swedish school also encouraged ''short-term,'' high-dose (5 Gy split/d for 5 days) RT to achieve a whole dose of 25 Gy, followed by surgery, not later than 1 week (11). A number of trials have evaluated these different preoperative RT schedules followed by surgery versus surgery alone in patients with rectal cancer (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). At least three meta-analyses have explored the benefit of preoperative RT (29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%