Five-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Stable Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The MASS III Trial

Hueb, Whady; Lopes, Neuza; Pereira, Alexandre C.; Hueb, Alexandre Ciappina; Soares, Paulo Rogério; Favarato, Desidério; Vieira, Ricardo D’Oliveira; Lima, Eduardo Gomes; Garzillo, Cibele Larrosa; Paulitch, Felipe da Silva; Cesar, Luiz Antônio Machado; Gersh, Bernard J.; Ramires, José Antônio Franchini

doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.924258

Cited by 115 publications

(111 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More reassuring data have recently been published from the MASS 3 trial with 5-year follow-up from a single centre with no difference in a composite end point of death, MI or further revascularisation between the groups and from the CORONARY study, which randomised 4752 patients to on or off pump and showed no significant difference in 30-day mortality or the incidence of MI, stroke and renal failure (23,24). Later outcomes data from this study are awaited with interest.…”

Section: Is Off Pump Coronary Artery Surgery Safe?mentioning

confidence: 80%

Almanac 2012 adult cardiac surgery

Bridgewater¹

2013

Anadolu Kardiyol Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review covers the important publications in adult cardiac surgery in the last few years, including the current evidence base for surgical revascularisation and the use of off-pump surgery, bilateral internal mammary arteries and endoscopic vein harvesting. The changes in conventional aortic valve surgery are described alongside the outcomes of clinical trials and registries for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and the introduction of less invasive and novel approaches of conventional aortic valve replacement surgery. Surgery for mitral valve disease is also considered, with particular reference to surgery for asymptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation. (Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2013; 13: 414-21) ALMANAC series ALMANAC serileri 414

show abstract

Section: Is Off Pump Coronary Artery Surgery Safe?mentioning

confidence: 80%

Almanac 2012 adult cardiac surgery

Bridgewater¹

2013

Anadolu Kardiyol Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hueb et al (27) reported the results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial (MASS III) of 308 patients undergoing CABG. Of those patients, 155 underwent OPCAB and 153 had ONCAB.…”

Section: Best Available Evidence For Long-term Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on survival: current best available evidence

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The superiority of either off-pump (OPCAB) or on-pump (ONCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unclear despite a large body of literature evidence comparing the two approaches.The potential advantages of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), minimizing aortic manipulation and maintaining pulsatile flow may be associated with reduced inflammatory responses and embolic events.Numerous studies compared OPCAB with ONCAB and the cumulative data have been presented in metaanalyses of both randomized and observational studies. Although there is an abundance of data with respect to the operative morbidity and mortality and the short-term outcomes associated with these two strategies, not much is known about how they impact long-term survival and recurrence of myocardial ischaemic events. Recent studies and meta-analyses have focused on long-term survival and major secondary outcomes in OPCAB vs. ONCAB within the general population. Significant limitations in methodology, however, have raised concerns about the strength of several randomized trials with restrictive inclusion criteria that reduced the populations to those at low risk only, thus creating result bias. Here, we present a review of the best available evidence with a focus on long-term outcomes.

show abstract

“…1 shows the trends in CABG use and outcomes over the Meanwhile, several other studies suggested that OPCAB was not associated with reduction of postoperative complication. [48][49][50][51][52][53] For instance, the ongoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off-or On-pump Revascularization Study (CORONARY) trial enrolled 4752 patients and hypothesizes that OPCAB is better than CABG in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current State-of-the-art of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Kajimoto¹

2014

J Jpn Coron Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Five-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Stable Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The MASS III Trial

Cited by 115 publications

References 27 publications

Almanac 2012 adult cardiac surgery

Almanac 2012 adult cardiac surgery

Impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on survival: current best available evidence

Current State-of-the-art of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About