2018
DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-Year Follow-up of a Longitudinal Cohort Study of the Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation for People with Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: Background: Few studies have examined the long-term consequences of using peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation (FES) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study examines orthotic effects on a longitudinal cohort and explores additional benefits of FES on self-reported measures such as joint pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An observational study that investigated the effect of FES on a range of measures over 5 years in a large cohort of participants with MS (n = 145) reported a statistically significant positive orthotic effect of FES on walking speed and joint pain, but there was no effect on QOL as measured by a self-reported visual analogue scale. 42 Future studies should consider investigating the effect of FES using a valid, clinically meaningful HRQOL over longer periods. Such studies, however, are challenging to undertake due to the potentially high dropout rate experienced in assistive device trials of longer duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An observational study that investigated the effect of FES on a range of measures over 5 years in a large cohort of participants with MS (n = 145) reported a statistically significant positive orthotic effect of FES on walking speed and joint pain, but there was no effect on QOL as measured by a self-reported visual analogue scale. 42 Future studies should consider investigating the effect of FES using a valid, clinically meaningful HRQOL over longer periods. Such studies, however, are challenging to undertake due to the potentially high dropout rate experienced in assistive device trials of longer duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the foot drop itself was more important than the diagnosis and pointed out that disease progression itself may account for the slightly different courses over the longer term. We note, moreover, that at 5 year follow-up, patients with MS continued to have an orthotic effect with tcFES [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking speed is increased similar to use of an ankle foot orthosis; however, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation. 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking speed is increased similar to use of an ankle foot orthosis; however, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation. [1][2][3][4][5] Increase in walking speed is most often reported to reflect clinical efficacy and in fact walking speed has previously been used as a surrogate marker of quality of life in determining cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation; 6 however, other effects such as increase in confidence, reduced falls or less effort of walking may all contribute to increased participation and are equally important. 7 Investigators have looked at the effect of functional electrical stimulation on the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale, a measure of the impact of an assisted device on the user's self-esteem, adaptability (impact on participation) and competence (aspects of walking).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%