Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students

Opdam, N.J.M.; Loomans, Bas; Roeters, F.J.M.; Bronkhorst, Ewald M.

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.005

Cited by 126 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The a na lysis of t he corona l restorations revealed that 78.5% were considered satisfactory at the mean evaluation time of 13 months, which was considered low as compared to studies that assessed retrospectively restorations performed by undergraduate students [17,21]. Those studies observed an 85.5% success rate at 3 years [17] and an 87% success rate at 5 years [21].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Clinical and radiographic assessment of root canal treatments performed by dental students

Benvenutti

Scalvi

Rodrigues-Junior

et al. 2016

RSBO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Retrospective assessment of procedures performed in dental school clinics is a valuable tool to critically assess the teaching/ learning process. Objective: This retrospective study assessed the success rate of root canal treatments executed by dental students during a two-year time span. Material and methods: Patients who had undergone root canal treatments at the clinics of the School of Dentistry of Unochapecó during 2011-2013 were recalled for assessment of the quality of the procedure and the associated coronal restoration. The quality of the root canal treatments was assessed clinically and radiographically, while the coronal restorations were assessed clinically by a trained dental student. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and chi-square test (α=0.05). Results: Thirtytwo patients returned for evaluation of 38 root canal treatments and coronal restorations. The success of root canal treatments was 89.5%, while 78.5% of the coronal restorations were considered successful. A significant association was observed between the success of the root canal treatments and the quality of the coronal restoration (p<0.005) and the apical length of the root canal filling (p<0.011). The presence of flaws within the filling material was not significantly associated to the success/failure of the root canal treatment (p=0.459). Conclusion: A high success rate of root canal treatment performed by dental students at an average 13-month evaluation period was observed. An adequate coronal restoration and a good apical sealing is required for a good prognosis of teeth undergoing root canal treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Clinical and radiographic assessment of root canal treatments performed by dental students

Benvenutti

Scalvi

Rodrigues-Junior

et al. 2016

RSBO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2,[14][15]22 Many of these studies have proven that ceramic material is an alternative to other materials, such as resin composite, gold and amalgam for Class I and II restorations, even for extensive defects. 2,[9][10]23,31,33 The rate of loss of amalgam restorations was calculated between 0-7%, for composite inlays between 0-9%, for gold inlays up to 5.9% and for ceramic restorations between 0-11.8%. In the current study, the rate of loss for composite inlays was 4%, and it was 2% for ceramic inlays.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various studies have confirmed the long-term success of CAD/CAM restorations. 17,19,29,31,34 In many studies, survival probability was calculated from 84% to 96%. In the current study, the survival probability of Evopress ceramic inlays was 98% and 96.3% for Filtek Z250 composite restorations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays Compared to Composite Restorations

Lange¹,

Pfeiffer²

2009

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThis study compared the clinical performance of indirectly manufactured ceramic Evopress inlays with those of directly placed, fine particle hybrid Filtek Z250 composite restorations in posterior teeth.From January 2000 to October 2003, 109 patients received 264 Evopress (Wegold) ceramic inlays and 68 patients received 145 Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) composite restorations in a dental office. Two-hundred and fifty ceramic inlays (95%) and 135 composite restorations (93%) were re-examined up to 57 months after placement. Modified USPHS criteria were used for the study. The worst finding of all the assessments was the overall assessment of individual restorations. On the basis of these criteria, 220 (88%) Evopress ceramic inlays were assessed as Alpha at the time of clinical re-examination, 26 (10%) were judged Beta and four ceramic inlays (2%) were rated Delta in the re-examination interval and thus categorized as failures. At the time of re-examination, 91 of the 135 composite restorations (67%) were judged Alpha, 36 restorations (26%) were rated Beta and three restorations (2%) were judged Charlie. Five restorations (4%) were categorized as failures (Delta). In two cases, there were marginal gap formations; there were also two cases of secondary caries after 28 and 35 months, as well as a fracture after 13 months. According to Kaplan and Meier, the survival rate after 57 months was 94% for ceramic inlays and 93% for composite restorations. The log rank test showed no significant differences in the survival curves.The current study showed that indirectly manufactured Evopress ceramic inlays performed better than direct Filtek Z250 composite restorations in marginal adaptation, color match and Ralf-Thomas Lange, Dr med, Dr med dent, dentist, private office, Mönchengladbach, Germany *Peter Pfeiffer, Prof Dr med dent, professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Oral Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany Clinical RelevanceEvopress ceramic inlays and Filtek Z250 composite restorations showed no significant difference regarding survival probability at 57 months when used as Class I and II restoratives in premolars and molars. Both materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance, with a preference for the ceramic inlays. 264Operative Dentistry anatomic form. However, with regard to survival probability, there was no significant difference.

show abstract

“…A longevidade das restaurações depende de muitos fatores, incluindo experiência do operador 2 , materiais e técnicas uti lizadas, critérios para substi tuição, colaboração do paciente quanto aos hábitos de higiene bucal, o meio bucal e sua contribuição para a suscepti bilidade à cárie do paciente 3 . A Odontologia Restauradora, a qual inclui principalmente o tratamento de cáries primárias e substi tuição das restaurações defi cientes, consti tui a maior parte do tratamento dentário, de forma que isto implica em um dos maiores custos dos tratamentos dentários em diversos países 4 , incluindo o Brasil.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Razões Para Substituição de Restaurações em Clínica Integrada

Pedrini¹

2009

Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objecti ve: To analyze the reasons for replacing amalgam and composite resin restorati ons of pati ents treated at the Integrated Clinic Discipline of the Dental School of Araçatuba (UNESP), SP, Brazil. Method: Aft er examining the pati ents for data collecti on to obtain a diagnosis, the treatment plan was outlined using a clinical form containing the restorati ons to be replaced, the reasons for replacing, the restorati ve material of choice and the number of restored surfaces. Next, all restorati ons indicated for replacement were examined as to their real need of replacement by 5 calibrated examiners taking into account the theorical concepts on the proposed criteria for the need of replacing or not. The analyzed period comprised 5 years (2001 to 2005). The criteria adopted for replacement were att ached to the data collecti ng form in order to standardize the analysis of the restorati ons. Results: 856 pati ents were treated within the studied period and 753 needed restorati on replacement. The main reasons for replacing amalgam restorati ons were defecti ve marginal adaptati on (40.9%), recurent caries (24.1%) and defi cient anatomical form (15.4%). The main reasons for replacing resin restorati ons were estheti cs (31.4%), defecti ve marginal adaptati on (29.2%) and recurent caries (20.7%). Conclusion:In spite of the litt le clinical experience of the studied populati on (undergraduate students), the reasons for replacing restorati ons were in accordance with the literature, having estehti cs as the main reason for the replacement of composite resin restorati ons and defecti ve marginal adaptati on for amalgam restorati ons.Objeti vo: Analisar as razões para as substi tuições de restaurações de amálgama e resina composta dentre os pacientes atendidos na disciplina de Clínica Integrada, da Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (UNESP). Método: Após a realização do exame dos pacientes para a coleta dos dados desti nada à formulação do diagnósti co, o plano de tratamento foi delineado uti lizando fi cha constando as restaurações a serem substi tuídas, as razões para essa substi tuição, o material restaurador uti lizado e o número de faces restauradas. A seguir, todas as indicações de substi tuições foram conferidas e checadas quanto à sua verdadeira necessidade por 5 examinadores calibrados quanto aos conceitos teóricos sobre os critérios propostos da necessidade ou não de substi tuição. O período de análise foi de 5 anos (2001 a 2005). Para padronizar a análise das restaurações, foi anexada à fi cha, critérios para as substi tuições. Resultados: Foram atendidos 856 pacientes, dos quais 753 necessitaram substi tuir restaurações. As principais razões que levaram a substi tuição de restaurações de amálgama foram: adaptação marginal defi ciente (40,9%), recidiva de cárie (24,1%) e forma anatômica defi ciente (15,4%). Para as restaurações de resina composta foram: razões estéti cas (31,4%), adaptação marginal defi ciente (29,2%) e recidiva de cárie (20,7%). Conclusão: A despeito da pouca experiência clínica da ...

show abstract

Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students

Cited by 126 publications

References 11 publications

Clinical and radiographic assessment of root canal treatments performed by dental students

Clinical and radiographic assessment of root canal treatments performed by dental students

Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays Compared to Composite Restorations

Razões Para Substituição de Restaurações em Clínica Integrada

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About