2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-week warning of COVID-19 peaks prior to the Omicron surge in Detroit, Michigan using wastewater surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human vertebrate viruses excreted through feces, urine, skin, saliva, and blood can be detected in wastewater to gather insights into viral diseases circulating within a population. Previous studies have associated viral presence in wastewater with outbreaks in the corresponding community (Bisseux et al, 2018; Farkas et al, 2018; Fernandez-Cassi et al, 2021; Galani et al, 2022; Hellmér et al, 2014; McCall et al, 2021; Peccia et al, 2020; Prevost et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2022). More recently, the CDC and public health departments have deemed wastewater monitoring as an integral public health surveillance tool for early detection and mitigation of COVID-19 (Kirby et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human vertebrate viruses excreted through feces, urine, skin, saliva, and blood can be detected in wastewater to gather insights into viral diseases circulating within a population. Previous studies have associated viral presence in wastewater with outbreaks in the corresponding community (Bisseux et al, 2018; Farkas et al, 2018; Fernandez-Cassi et al, 2021; Galani et al, 2022; Hellmér et al, 2014; McCall et al, 2021; Peccia et al, 2020; Prevost et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2022). More recently, the CDC and public health departments have deemed wastewater monitoring as an integral public health surveillance tool for early detection and mitigation of COVID-19 (Kirby et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, the N gene was the best indicator of viral concentration in WWTP samples. Other studies also use the N gene as the preferred target for viral detection [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In our study, which aimed to quantify SARS-CoV-2 ARN in wastewater irrespective of the viral strain circulating at the time, the N gene is a logical best target as it is more conserved than the S gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported the SARS-CoV-2 viral amount in wastewater as concentration, viral gene copies per litre, and were able to show that the viral concentration is directly correlated with the reported number of infections. Other studies reported their data as concentration [ 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], and some even demonstrated that the normalization of clinical data using wastewater flow rate and percentage of sanitary flow did not significantly improve the correlation between the SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater and COVID-19 clinical cases in communities during the study period [ 33 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study suggests that wastewater concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA are also well-correlated with COVID-19 prevalence, which was estimated from randomized nasal swab sampling, more so than incident clinical cases because case data are prone to reporting biases such as underreporting of asymptomatic cases [9]. In addition, trends in wastewater concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA were found to precede trends in incident clinical cases in communities [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. WBE may therefore be a more reliable and objective tool than incident clinical case data for continued monitoring of COVID-19 because wastewater captures both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals and does not depend on test seeking behavior or testing availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%