2003
DOI: 10.1657/1523-0430(2003)035[0074:fsotaa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Stages of the Alaskan Arctic Cold Season with Ecosystem Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important biophysical transition during snow accumulation takes place when the ground surface becomes decoupled from the air temperatures (Olsson et al 2003). This decoupling has been reported to occur with snow depths of 15-20 cm (Pruitt 1957), or according to more recent work by Taras et al (2002) with snow depths of around 80 cm.…”
Section: The Potential Effects Of the Changing Cold Season On Ecosystmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An important biophysical transition during snow accumulation takes place when the ground surface becomes decoupled from the air temperatures (Olsson et al 2003). This decoupling has been reported to occur with snow depths of 15-20 cm (Pruitt 1957), or according to more recent work by Taras et al (2002) with snow depths of around 80 cm.…”
Section: The Potential Effects Of the Changing Cold Season On Ecosystmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The air temperature and the temperature in the litterbags were measured from 15 November 2012 to 30 October 2013, and the following measures were calculated to clearly describe the temperature characteristics: daily mean temperature, positive accumulated temperature (sum of temperatures above 0 °C), negative accumulated temperature (sum of temperatures below 0 °C) [17,18], and the number of freeze-thaw cycles per day (one freeze-thaw cycle was completed when the threshold of 0 °C was crossed twice within at least 3 h) [34] of each critical period (Table 1). To quantify the cellulose and lignin concentrations in the litter at different critical periods, which were identified based on Olsson's period division of the cold season [35] and the field investigation of our previous To quantify the cellulose and lignin concentrations in the litter at different critical periods, which were identified based on Olsson's period division of the cold season [35] and the field investigation of our previous studies [17,18,36,37], we sampled the litterbags at the end of each critical period over the first year of litter decomposition on 26 December 2012 (snow formation period, SFP), 8 March 2013 (snow cover period, SCP), 24 April 2013 (snow melt period, SMP), and 30 October 2013 (growing season, GS). The litterbags were transported back to the laboratory for analysis.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PolarVPRM, snow season R is calculated according to soil temperature, rather than air temperature, because rates of subnivean respiration are driven primarily by soil temperature rather than air temperature (Grogan and Jonasson, 2006;Panikov et al, 2006;Sullivan et al, 2008;Morgner et al, 2010). Arctic field studies have shown that a large portion of annual carbon efflux can occur during the snow season (Aurela et al, 2004;Sullivan et al, 2008;Elberling and Brandt, 2003), and that the low thermal conductivity of an overlying snowpack (e.g., 0.06 W (m • C) −1 ; Sturm, 1992) substantially decouples Arctic soil and air temperatures, e.g., by 10-40 • C; (Zimov et al, 1993), or by 15-20 • C; (Olsson et al, 2003).…”
Section: Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arctic field studies have shown that a large portion of annual carbon efflux can occur during the snow season (Aurela et al, 2004;Sullivan et al, 2008;Elberling and Brandt, 2003), and that the low thermal conductivity of an overlying snowpack (e.g., 0.06 W (m • C) −1 ; Sturm, 1992) substantially decouples Arctic soil and air temperatures, e.g., by 10-40 • C; (Zimov et al, 1993), or by 15-20 • C; (Olsson et al, 2003). Calculating snow season R according to soil temperature, rather than setting R to a low constant value like in VPRM, is therefore likely to better capture inter-annual and seasonal variability in snow season NEE, and reduce uncertainty in annual Arctic C budgets (Luus et al, 2013c).…”
Section: Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%