2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five NOTCH4 polymorphisms show weak evidence for association with schizophrenia: evidence from meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity among the studies suggests that some unknown factor may lead to the association of several SNPs with the disease in some contexts but not in others. 29 The effect of SNPs on schizophrenia risk may be moderated by sample or study characteristics not addressed in the present analyses. In three family-based association studies, we did not find significant evidence for association of the SNPs rs3916967 and rs2391191 with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The heterogeneity among the studies suggests that some unknown factor may lead to the association of several SNPs with the disease in some contexts but not in others. 29 The effect of SNPs on schizophrenia risk may be moderated by sample or study characteristics not addressed in the present analyses. In three family-based association studies, we did not find significant evidence for association of the SNPs rs3916967 and rs2391191 with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, subsequent studies using mainly the same markers failed to replicate the initial findings [McGinnis et al, 2001;Sklar et al, 2001;Fan et al, 2002;Tochigi et al, 2004]. Nor did a meta-analysis of the association studies of these five markers find a significant association [Glatt et al, 2005]. Zhang et al [2004], however, observed an association of rs520692; not one of the five original markers employed by Wei and Hemmings [2000], in 141 Han Chinese trios (P ¼ 0.017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…12 Population heterogeneity, phenotypic heterogeneity, interweaving diagnostic criteria and misclassification, overestimated risk in the initial study, small sample size, influence of multiple loci (causal heterogeneity) and genetic-environmental interactions are among the indicated causes for the failure of replication of association studies. 5,7,12,13 Some of the strongest causative candidates to date are considered to be DISC1, DTNBP1, COMT, NRG1 and RGS4.…”
Section: Schizophrenia (F20 International Classification Of Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%