2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five new real-time detections of fast radio bursts with UTMOST

Abstract: Abstract We detail a new fast radio burst (FRB) survey with the Molonglo Radio Telescope, in which six FRBs were detected between 2017 June and 2018 December. By using a real-time FRB detection system, we captured raw voltages for five of the six events, which allowed for coherent dedispersion and very high time resolution (10.24 $\mu$s) studies of the bursts. Five of the FRBs show temporal broadening consistent with interstellar and/or intergalactic scattering, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the surveys that did publish rates, we convert the published rates into rates per survey expressed as the number of FRBs detected per day of observing time. In this paper we adopt R htru ∼ 0.08 FRBs/day (Champion et al 2016), R askap−fly ∼ 0.12 FRBs/day (Shannon et al 2018) and R palfa ∼ 0.04 FRBs/day (Patel et al 2018) and R utmost ∼ 1/63 FRBs/day (Farah et al 2018). These rates encapsulate limits by their survey nature, whether in terms of observing frequency, fluence thresholds, sky coverage or any other selection effects.…”
Section: Frb Detection Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the surveys that did publish rates, we convert the published rates into rates per survey expressed as the number of FRBs detected per day of observing time. In this paper we adopt R htru ∼ 0.08 FRBs/day (Champion et al 2016), R askap−fly ∼ 0.12 FRBs/day (Shannon et al 2018) and R palfa ∼ 0.04 FRBs/day (Patel et al 2018) and R utmost ∼ 1/63 FRBs/day (Farah et al 2018). These rates encapsulate limits by their survey nature, whether in terms of observing frequency, fluence thresholds, sky coverage or any other selection effects.…”
Section: Frb Detection Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently set to follow the spectral index seen in pulsars, with a value of −1.4 (Bates et al 2013), a diverse range of predictions are present in the literature. Where for instance Macquart et al (2019) argue for a steep negative spectral index, Farah et al (2019) suggests a possible spectral turnover in line with Ravi & Loeb (2019). Further muddling the idea of a spectral index are repeater observations presenting indications of FRBs to be emitted in emission envelops (e.g.…”
Section: Observed Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This programme runs in parallel with searches for undiscovered pulsars and single pulses from rotating radio transients (RRATs), and Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). These searches have already led to the discovery of thirteen FRBs (Caleb et al 2017;Farah et al 2018Farah et al , 2019Gupta et al 2019a,b,c,d) and the intermittent pulsar candidate PSR J1659−54 (Venkatraman Kr-E-mail: mlower@swin.edu.au 1 Not an acronym. ishnan et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of each fanbeam is an 8-bit filterbank with spectral and temporal resolution of 98 kHz and 327 µs respectively. These filterbanks were searched for FRBs using a modified version of HEIMDALL, and burst candidates are validated via a machine learning pipeline operating in real-time (Farah et al 2018(Farah et al , 2019. We searched for FRBs with widths in the range 327 µs to 42 ms, dispersion measures (DMs) in the range 0 <DM< 5000 pc cm −3 .…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%