2014
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2013.876230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Methods to Score the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation Checklist and to Examine Group Differences

Abstract: This study compared 5 scoring methods in terms of their statistical assumptions. They were then used to score the Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation Checklist, a measure consisting of 3 subscales and 21 Likert-type items. The 5 methods used were (a) sum/average scores of items, (b) latent factor scores with continuous indicators, (c) latent factor scores with ordered categorical indicators using the mean-and variance-adjusted weighted least squares estimation method, (d) latent factor scores with orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike some constructs that perform better at the student level (e.g., cognitive engagement, see Konold et al, 2014) or only make sense at the school level (e.g., racial diversity), the overall Aggressive Attitudes scale can be used at both levels as shown by good model fit at either level. Because the factor structure of a construct affects the use and interpretation of scale scores (Wang et al, 2015), our findings support the use of an overall summed score to represent the Aggressive Attitudes scale at both the student and at the school level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Unlike some constructs that perform better at the student level (e.g., cognitive engagement, see Konold et al, 2014) or only make sense at the school level (e.g., racial diversity), the overall Aggressive Attitudes scale can be used at both levels as shown by good model fit at either level. Because the factor structure of a construct affects the use and interpretation of scale scores (Wang et al, 2015), our findings support the use of an overall summed score to represent the Aggressive Attitudes scale at both the student and at the school level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, this robust chi-square difference is susceptible to sample size, just as the absolute chi-square tests are. For more information on and an example of how different estimation methods affect measurement invariance testing and substantive research hypothesis testing, see Wang et al (2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers responded to each question using a 6-point Likert scale (1 = never to 6 = almost always ). TOCA-C had accumulated strong evidence in terms of validity and reliability (Koth et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2015). Teachers in the study completed TOCA-C before and after the implementation of IY-TCM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%