2024
DOI: 10.3847/psj/ad2202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Mars Years of Cloud Observations at Gale Crater: Opacities, Variability, and Ice Crystal Habits

Conor W. Hayes,
Jacob L. Kloos,
Alex C. Innanen
et al.

Abstract: We update the record of cloud opacity observations conducted by the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover to cover the first five Mars Years (MYs) of the mission (L s = 160° of MY 31 to L s = 160° of MY 36). Over the three MY period that we add to the previously analyzed two MY record, we achieve good diurnal coverage between 07:00 and 17:00 with nearly 1200 new observations. We derive a new scattering phase function for the clouds of the Aphelion Cloud Belt (ACB) us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we initially used the same method as Cooper et al (2019), using MCS optical depths for Δτ WIC , we also computed the phase function replacing these optical depths with those derived from MSL cloud observations (Hayes et al 2023). This has the advantage that the MSL values are calculated for specific cloud observations, whereas the MCS tau values are average values.…”
Section: Deriving the Phase Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While we initially used the same method as Cooper et al (2019), using MCS optical depths for Δτ WIC , we also computed the phase function replacing these optical depths with those derived from MSL cloud observations (Hayes et al 2023). This has the advantage that the MSL values are calculated for specific cloud observations, whereas the MCS tau values are average values.…”
Section: Deriving the Phase Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, neither approach is without weakness. The MSL-derived tau values are calculated using an assumed phase function, the weaknesses of which are discussed in Hayes et al (2023). However, given the advantages in seeing either the same clouds, or at least temporally nearby clouds, we have made the choice to continue using the phase-function values calculated with MSL-derived tau values.…”
Section: Challenges In Determining Tau In Phase Function Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations