Five Elements of Normative Ethics - A General Theory of Normative Individualism

Abstract

The article tries to inquire a third way in normative ethics between consequentialism or utilitarianism and deontology or Kantianism. To find such a third way in normative ethics, one has to analyze the elements of these classical theories and to look if they are justified. In this article it is argued that an adequate normative ethics has to contain the following five elements: (1) normative individualism, i. e., the view that in the last instance moral norms and values can only be justified by reference to the individuals concerned, as its basis; (2) consideration of the individuals' concerns and interests-aims, desires, needs, strivings-insofar as they have a justificatory function; (3) a pluralism of references of these concerns and hence of moral norms and values to all possible elements of actions; (4) the necessity of a principle of aggregation and weighing with regard to these concerns; (5) finally, as a central principle of aggregation and weighing, the principle of relative reference to self and others, operating as a generalizing meta-principle that guides the application of concrete principles and decisions.

Ethical content in artificial intelligence systems: A demand explained in three critical points

“…By analyzing these challenges, one may see that the troubles are not technological as they reflect old human questionings regarding ethical theories. From this point of view, when appreciating ethics in the AI context, pluralism, which assumes that it is not necessary to choose only one theory of normative ethics ( von der Pfordten, 2012 ), is a valuable alternative to comprehending a hybrid agency model. For instance, deontology and utilitarianisms are formal theories that could help to build an AI Ethics field to develop norms to regulate and guide the implicit ethical agency feature.…”

Do High Psychopaths Care More about Moral Consequences than Low Psychopaths in Chinese Culture? An Exploration Using the CNI Model

“…It stands in sharp contrast to individualism, a cultural model that exists mainly in North America and Western Europe. Individual independence is the main idea in Western culture, while collectivism is the main idea in Chinese culture [ 42 , 43 ]. These two ideas are formed in the process of social development and are reflected in all aspects of society, thus affecting people’s behavior patterns [ 44 , 45 ].…”

Proposing the “Value- and Evidence-Based decision making and Practice” (VEDMAP) framework for Priority-Setting and knowledge translation in low and Middle-Income Countries: A novel framework for Decision-Making in Low-and middle income countries like Malawi

“…Furthermore, normative values assess what one ought to do to be considered a moral or professional individual. These values can also determine the professionalism of an organization by examining ethical standards that regulate right or wrong conduct [35] , [36] , [37] . Examples of normative values are moral rules, policies, principles/values of strategic plans, ethical guidelines, code of ethics, resource allocation value frameworks and equitable access value framework.…”