2011
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.529589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-Axis Machining and Burnishing of Complex Parts for the Improvement of Surface Roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also reported by Luca et al [15] that the roughness Rab = 0.2/im and the ratio of Ra,/Rab ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 were obtained on a hardened steel component (64 HRC) after ball burnishing using a ceramic ball of 6.35 mm diameter. The applicability of this innovative nonremoval technology was also positively verified by López de Lacalle et al [8,26] by improving the final quality of the previously ball-end milled surfaces of dies and moulds using CNC machining centers. Travieso-Rodriguez et al [27] presented similar results when ball burnishing concave and convex milled surfaces of workpieces made of a hard G10380 (AISI 1038) steel based on Taguchi experimental design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is also reported by Luca et al [15] that the roughness Rab = 0.2/im and the ratio of Ra,/Rab ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 were obtained on a hardened steel component (64 HRC) after ball burnishing using a ceramic ball of 6.35 mm diameter. The applicability of this innovative nonremoval technology was also positively verified by López de Lacalle et al [8,26] by improving the final quality of the previously ball-end milled surfaces of dies and moulds using CNC machining centers. Travieso-Rodriguez et al [27] presented similar results when ball burnishing concave and convex milled surfaces of workpieces made of a hard G10380 (AISI 1038) steel based on Taguchi experimental design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Extensive work exists analyzing the surface topography after burnishing, establishing that results are mainly dependent on the applied force [8] and the initial roughness state [9]. Authors have conventionally chosen 2D surface roughness parameters, mainly the average surface roughness R a , to describe the surface state [10,11]. In some cases, extreme points such as R t or R z [12] have been used to evaluate burnishing results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Fig. 9, the system is designed to fully cover the X dimension of the area of interest (13). In some cases, this area of interest covers the complete part surface, while in others it is restricted to specific features of the part.…”
Section: Basic Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paths required to obtain the measurement of any feature within the part can be complex, and this problem is addressed in many investigations [9][10][11]. Motion planning of laser sensors benefits from its similarity to production technologies where path-oriented systems are widely used [12], including milling, grinding, roller burnishing [13] and spraying. In addition to concern with tool collision, with a laser sensor there are also concerns with occlusion of either the laser or the camera [11,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%