2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five-a-day, a price to pay: An evaluation of the UK program impact accounting for market forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic and lifestyle characteristics assessed were: gender, age, marital status, living status, region of residence, number of years of education, smoking habits, alcoholic drinking habits, dietary supplement taking habits, height and weight (used to calculate body mas index) and month of questionnaire completion. These characteristics have all previously been associated with FV consumption and dietary knowledge. The complete questionnaire is provided in Appendix S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic and lifestyle characteristics assessed were: gender, age, marital status, living status, region of residence, number of years of education, smoking habits, alcoholic drinking habits, dietary supplement taking habits, height and weight (used to calculate body mas index) and month of questionnaire completion. These characteristics have all previously been associated with FV consumption and dietary knowledge. The complete questionnaire is provided in Appendix S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 For diet, the econometric analysis of the UK 5 a day marketing campaign, aimed at increasing F&V consumption in the population, concluded that the campaign increased average F&V consumption by 0.3 portions per day. 57 A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in retirement age adults increased F&V intake by approximately one portion per day both the short term (less than a year) and long term (more than a year). 58 Translating this kind of evidence for impact assessment is challenging, but required, to estimate the likely effectiveness of different interventions.…”
Section: Unanswered Questions and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples include food labeling, food reformulation, food taxes and subsidies, income and social protection policies [22]. Agentic approaches have usually targeted the entire population or disadvantaged populations only [50, 51] (e.g. nutrition education and health information campaigns) [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%