2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4996128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting pole-zero micromechanical models to cochlear response measurements

Abstract: An efficient way of describing the linear micromechanical response of the cochlea is in terms of its poles and zeros. Pole-zero models with local scaling symmetry are derived for both one and two degree-of-freedom micromechanical systems. These elements are then used in a model of the coupled cochlea, which is optimised to minimise the mean square difference between its frequency response and that measured on the basilar membrane inside the mouse cochlea by Lee, Raphael, Xia, Kim, Grillet, Applegate, Ellerbee … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because a variety of linearized models can reproduce the main features of measured BM transfer functions in the lowlevel linear regime (e.g., Refs. [18,23,24,65,91]), evaluating models based on their linear responses is a necessary but insufficient measure of "quality." As Zweig pointed out [32], different linear models, even those with different numbers of spatial dimensions, can be considered functionally equivalent if they predict similar wave numbers for the traveling wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a variety of linearized models can reproduce the main features of measured BM transfer functions in the lowlevel linear regime (e.g., Refs. [18,23,24,65,91]), evaluating models based on their linear responses is a necessary but insufficient measure of "quality." As Zweig pointed out [32], different linear models, even those with different numbers of spatial dimensions, can be considered functionally equivalent if they predict similar wave numbers for the traveling wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis here examines the impulse response of the cochlear model constructed by Elliott, Ni & Sun (2017) . The model is comprised of multiple fluid-coupled sections each of which has 2-DOF micromechanics involving the BM and the TM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Elliott, Ni & Sun (2017) fitted data from the Ogahalai lab—velocity and phase of the mouse cochlea in response to sinusoidal stimuli of 10, 30, 50, and 70 dB SPL ( Lee et al, 2015 )—with a ‘coupled-box’ model of the mammalian cochlea which contained 2-DOF micromechanical elements. The micromechanical elements were coupled by fluid according to that in Elliott, Lineton & Ni (2011) , and the general form of the basilar membrane (BM) admittance of the coupled-box model had four poles and three zeros.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the micro mechanical model shows that the interactions between BM and OHC enhance BM motion. Although the specifics of this interaction are unclear, it is caused by a complicated process that can be probed by fitting the cochlear model to experimental data [4]. To summarize the modeling studies, macro and micro-cochlear mechanics are equivalent and dependent on each of the proposed models.…”
Section: Mathematical Description Of the Cochlear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, cochlear mechanics have been described by a one-dimensional (1D) model of fluid and mechanical dynamics [2,3]. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) models have been shown to better match experimental results compared with 1D models [4]. In this regard, it has been reported that there is no substantial difference in response between 3D and two-dimensional (2D) models [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%