2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13538-011-0012-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting Cosmological Data to the Function q(z) from GR Theory: Modified Chaplygin Gas

Abstract: In the Friedmann cosmology, the deceleration of the expansion q plays a fundamental role. We derive the deceleration as a function of redshift q(z) in two scenarios: CDM model and modified Chaplygin gas (MCG) model. The function for the MCG model is then fitted to the cosmological data in order to obtain the cosmological parameters that minimize χ 2 . We use the Fisher matrix to construct the covariance matrix of our parameters and reconstruct the q(z) function. We use Supernovae Ia, WMAP5, and BAO measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) the case of A = 0 recovers generalized Chaplygin gas EoS, and A = 0 together α = 1 recovers the original Chaplygin gas EoS. The best fitted parameters are found to be A = 0.085 and α = 1.724, while Constitution + CMB + BAO and Union + CMB + BAO results are A = 0.061 ± 0.079, α = 0.053 ± 0.089, and A = 0.110 ± 0.097, α = 0.089 ± 0.099 respectively [20], [21]. Other observational constraints on modified Chaplygin gas model using Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach found that A = 0.00189 +0.00583 −0.00756 , α = 0.1079 +0.3397 −0.2539 at 1σ level and A = 0.00189 +0.00660 −0.00915 with α = 0.1079 +0.4678 −0.2911 at 2σ level [22].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…(1) the case of A = 0 recovers generalized Chaplygin gas EoS, and A = 0 together α = 1 recovers the original Chaplygin gas EoS. The best fitted parameters are found to be A = 0.085 and α = 1.724, while Constitution + CMB + BAO and Union + CMB + BAO results are A = 0.061 ± 0.079, α = 0.053 ± 0.089, and A = 0.110 ± 0.097, α = 0.089 ± 0.099 respectively [20], [21]. Other observational constraints on modified Chaplygin gas model using Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach found that A = 0.00189 +0.00583 −0.00756 , α = 0.1079 +0.3397 −0.2539 at 1σ level and A = 0.00189 +0.00660 −0.00915 with α = 0.1079 +0.4678 −0.2911 at 2σ level [22].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…where we can observe that the transition redshift for a non-flat universe C DM is a analytical function of the parameters of relative densities [55]. Using Eqs.…”
Section: The C Dm Model In the Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, using the definition of H (z) and the condition for the transition redshift q(z t ) = 0. We can determine that [55],…”
Section: The C Dm Model In the Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best fitted parameters are found to be A = 0.085 and α = 1.724, while Constitution + CMB + BAO and Union + CMB + BAO results are A = 0.061 ± 0.079, α = 0.053 ± 0.089, and A = 0.110 ± 0.097, α = 0.089 ± 0.099 respectively [17], [18]. Other observational constraints on modified Chaplygin gas model using Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach found that A = 0.00189 −0.2911 at 2σ level [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%