Fitting Characteristics of Eighteen N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators

Abstract

Four performance measures were used to evaluate the fitting characteristics of 18 models of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators: (1) the 5th percentile simulated workplace protection factor (SWPF) value, (2) the shift average SWPF value, (3) the h-value, and (4) the assignment error. The effect of fit-testing on the level of protection provided by the respirators was also evaluated. The respirators were tested on a panel of 25 subjects with various face sizes. Simulated workplace protection factor values, determined from six total penetration (face-seal leakage plus filter penetration) tests with re-donning between each test, were used to indicate respirator performance. Five fit-tests were used: Bitrex, saccharin, generated aerosol corrected for filter penetration, PortaCount Plus corrected for filter penetration, and the PortaCount Plus with the N95-Companion accessory. Without fit-testing, the 5th percentile SWPF for all models combined was 2.9 with individual model values ranging from 1.3 to 48.0. Passing a fit-test generally resulted in an increase in protection. In addition, the h-value of each respirator was computed. The h-value has been determined to be the population fraction of individuals who will obtain an adequate level of protection (i.e., SWPF >/=10, which is the expected level of protection for half-facepiece respirators) when a respirator is selected and donned (including a user seal check) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions without fit-testing. The h-value for all models combined was 0.74 (i.e., 74% of all donnings resulted in an adequate level of protection), with individual model h-values ranging from 0.31 to 0.99. Only three models had h-values above 0.95. Higher SWPF values were achieved by excluding SWPF values determined for test subject/respirator combinations that failed a fit-test. The improvement was greatest for respirator models with lower h-values. Using the concepts of shift average and assignment error to measure respirator performance yielded similar results. The highest level of protection was provided by passing a fit-test with a respirator having good fitting characteristics.

Prevention of nosocomial transmission of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in rural South African district hospitals: an epidemiological modelling study

“…Respiratory protection: The efficiency of an N95 respirators is 95%, with a real-world face-seal leakage rate of 0-39% [8,[47][48][49][50]. Adherence ranges between 44% and 97% [51][52][53].…”

Comparison of Performance of Three Different Types of Respiratory Protection Devices

“…(3−5) The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has demonstrated previously that N95 filtering-facepiece respirators have a wide range of fitting characteristics. (6,7) Elastomeric type half-facepieces have not been assessed since the mid-1980s in NIOSH-sponsored studies. (8,9) This study assesses the fitting characteristics of both N95 elastomeric half-facepiece and filtering-facepiece respirators.…”

Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos: Correlação Entre Tempo De Uso Do Eletrocautério E Tempo Cirúrgico

“…As máscaras cirúrgicas, utilizadas atualmente nas salas operatórias (28) , não são adequadas, visto que não protegem corretamente os trabalhadores frente à presença de poluentes químicos gerados pela fumaça (29) . Aliado ao uso das máscaras respiratórias, faz-se necessário o uso dos óculos de proteção para proteção da mucosa ocular (18) .…”