2007
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2007.897929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting a Two-Component Scattering Model to Polarimetric SAR Data From Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the adaptive volume scattering model proposed in this paper is similar to that used by Freeman [11], which can be rewritten in its equivalent coherency matrix form as: (21) By comparing Equations (12) and (21), the difference lies in the range for . However, Equation (21) cannot be directly used in the three-component decomposition scheme because there exists risk in over-estimating the volume scattering power (note can be arbitrarily large by definition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that the adaptive volume scattering model proposed in this paper is similar to that used by Freeman [11], which can be rewritten in its equivalent coherency matrix form as: (21) By comparing Equations (12) and (21), the difference lies in the range for . However, Equation (21) cannot be directly used in the three-component decomposition scheme because there exists risk in over-estimating the volume scattering power (note can be arbitrarily large by definition).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume scattering is originally modeled by a cloud of uniformly distributed dipoles [1] whose coherency matrix is given by: (11) However, it has been observed that this model sometimes leads to over-estimation of the volume scattering power and consequently generates a negative power in the derived surface and double-bounce scattering [3]. This phenomenon happens whenever in the transformed coherency matrix.…”
Section: Adaptive Volume Scattering Model and Power Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach represents target scattering by several basic scattering mechanisms. Since 1970, this technique has become an advanced research area in polarimetric SAR signal processing, with many valuable coherent and incoherent decompositions being developed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Among these methods, Cloude-Pottier decomposition has attracted considerable attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails the existence of a polarization where volume scattering does not contribute, after which it follows that this solution is not consistent with physical model for forest scattering (44), (38). The ground structure matrix is characterized by the lowest coherence values, being contaminated by volume contributions.…”
Section: Physical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: the ground and the vegetation layer. This idea has been formalized in literature through different physical models, considering the features of ground and volume scattering in polarimetric data (38), single-polarization tomographic data, as shown in (26) and in the previous section, or in polarimetric and interferometric (PolInSAR) data (13), (39), (27). Beside physical soundness, however, the popularity of two-layered models is also due to the fact that they provide a sufficiently simple mathematical framework to allow model inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%