2002
DOI: 10.1162/106365602317301754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness Landscapes and Evolvability

Abstract: In this paper, we develop techniques based on evolvability statistics of the fitness land-scape surrounding sampled solutions. Averaging the measures over a sample of equal fitness solutions allows us to build up fitness evolvability portraits of the fitness land-scape, which we show can be used to compare both the ruggedness and neutrality in a set of tunably rugged and tunably neutral landscapes. We further show that the tech-niques can be used with solution samples collected through both random sampling of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge of the fundamental characteristics of the problem being optimised at the level at which optimisation algorithms operate. These characteristics are represented by the fitness landscape, firstly introduced by Wright (1932), which describes the search space of an optimisation problem as a multidimensional landscape defined by the possible solutions, through which the optimisation algorithm moves, mapped to the corresponding fitness value (Smith et al, 2002). As such, the fitness landscape is not only dependent upon the problem to be solved, but also on the choice of algorithm and its parameter values.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowledge of the fundamental characteristics of the problem being optimised at the level at which optimisation algorithms operate. These characteristics are represented by the fitness landscape, firstly introduced by Wright (1932), which describes the search space of an optimisation problem as a multidimensional landscape defined by the possible solutions, through which the optimisation algorithm moves, mapped to the corresponding fitness value (Smith et al, 2002). As such, the fitness landscape is not only dependent upon the problem to be solved, but also on the choice of algorithm and its parameter values.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portraits (Smith et al, 2002) While there are numerous fitness landscape characteristics and corresponding metrics, the statistical reliability of these metrics is frequently called into question. One of the main reasons that these measures have been found to be unreliable is that no rigorous definition of the concept of "difficulty" is available in the framework of evolutionary optimisation (Kallel, 1998).…”
Section: Fitness Evolvabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolvability is the ability of a population to produce offspring fitter than any yet in existence [1], and not to produce less fit variants [13], and is therefore fundamental to the process of evolution itself. Evolvability is also known as evolutionary adaptability [8] and as such, a major element of evolvability is the capacity to adapt to changing environments by learning to exploit commonalities over time in those environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…" " (arms race) [3] 1 [4] [4,5] [6] (ruggedness) (neutrality) [3,[7][8][9][10][11] Ebner [12] ---25 - …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%