2023
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness functions for RNA structure design

Abstract: An RNA design algorithm takes a target RNA structure and finds a sequence that folds into that structure. This is fundamentally important for engineering therapeutics using RNA. Computational RNA design algorithms are guided by fitness functions, but not much research has been done on the merits of these functions. We survey current RNA design approaches with a particular focus on the fitness functions used. We experimentally compare the most widely used fitness functions in RNA design algorithms on both synth… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eterna designs were originally evaluated computationally as to whether the sequence is predicted to fold with the lowest free energy to the target structure. This can be achieved whether or not the NED is relatively low. ,, Therefore, we expected that many of the designs would not provide low NED, despite performing well by minimum free energy folding. We compared the lowest NED for our solutions using P–Z to the lowest NED using Eterna player RNA sequences (Figure S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eterna designs were originally evaluated computationally as to whether the sequence is predicted to fold with the lowest free energy to the target structure. This can be achieved whether or not the NED is relatively low. ,, Therefore, we expected that many of the designs would not provide low NED, despite performing well by minimum free energy folding. We compared the lowest NED for our solutions using P–Z to the lowest NED using Eterna player RNA sequences (Figure S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved whether or not the NED is relatively low. 13 , 44 , 45 Therefore, we expected that many of the designs would not provide low NED, despite performing well by minimum free energy folding. We compared the lowest NED for our solutions using P–Z to the lowest NED using Eterna player RNA sequences ( Figure S4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also require that its native (target) secondary structure is complete, i.e., that no part of the motif sequence forms base pairs outside of it. To analyze how the addition of different flanking sequences around a motif change its structure, we adopt several different measures that operate on its secondary structure representation [64, 65]: (i) structure probability 𝒫 (ℳ), (ii) ensemble defect ED(ℳ), and (iii) Shannon entropy SE(ℳ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure probability. A very simple yet powerful measure of motif stability is simply the likelihood of its exact structure ocurring at equilibrium, P(M) [65]. The value of structure probability is obtained from the thermal ensemble of RNA structures, counting the number of occurrences of the exact (target) motif and dividing it with the number of all structures in the ensemble.…”
Section: Measures Of Motif Structural Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partition function can be used to calculate the probability of a structure. The probability of a structure is known to be a good guide for inverse folding [21]. Gradients with respect to the sequence distribution can be computed, which lets us optimize the probability by gradient descent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%