2018
DOI: 10.7554/elife.37272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness effects of altering gene expression noise in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Gene expression noise is an evolvable property of biological systems that describes differences in expression among genetically identical cells in the same environment. Prior work has shown that expression noise is heritable and can be shaped by selection, but the impact of variation in expression noise on organismal fitness has proven difficult to measure. Here, we quantify the fitness effects of altering expression noise for the TDH3 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that increases in expression nois… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(127 reference statements)
7
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, Cra expression noise only results in a fitness benefit when the increase in fitness during adaptive evolution. This pattern holds for nongenetic variation 428 in general, and is consistent with prior theoretical [15,16] and empirical work [17]. This 429 occurs because in populations remote from a fitness optimum, random variation in 430 phenotype is more likely to push some individuals closer to the optimum than in a 431 well-adapted population.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, Cra expression noise only results in a fitness benefit when the increase in fitness during adaptive evolution. This pattern holds for nongenetic variation 428 in general, and is consistent with prior theoretical [15,16] and empirical work [17]. This 429 occurs because in populations remote from a fitness optimum, random variation in 430 phenotype is more likely to push some individuals closer to the optimum than in a 431 well-adapted population.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The fitness benefit of nongenetic variation in a trait often diminishes as populations 217 approach the optimum value for that trait [15][16][17]. We investigated whether this 218 reduction also occurs in our model.…”
Section: Cra Expression Noise Increases Fitness 202mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While these mutations are a subset of the types of changes that arise spontaneously, they are the most common type of point mutation observed in mutation accumulation lines (27,28) and the most common type of single nucleotide polymorphism segregating in natural populations of S. cerevisiae (29). Using a canvanine resistance assay (30,31), we estimated that the EMS conditions used introduced ~29 mutations per cell (95% percentiles: [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Following mutagenesis, we isolated single cells from each of the mutagenized populations randomly with respect to the YFP fluorescence level using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) ( Figure 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…YFP fluorescence levels were then estimated based on at least ~ 12 thousand events captured with flow cytometry from each replicate population (Supplementary Methods, Table S2a). These YFP fluorescence levels were used to estimate YFP mRNA expression levels as in (32) (Figure 1a). In parallel, for each promoter, populations of un-mutagenized cells were subjected to a sham treatment that was identical to the mutagenesis protocol except for exposure to EMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%