1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00171104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness consequences of prolonged copulation in the bowl and doily spider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With mated females, males copulated twice only if mating very soon after those of the first male, otherwise they copulated only once. A similar pattern of reduced or zero sperm transfer to mated females was found in Frontinella pyramitela (Austad, 1982;Suter & Parkhill, 1990). Some evidence for sperm limitation applies in both species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With mated females, males copulated twice only if mating very soon after those of the first male, otherwise they copulated only once. A similar pattern of reduced or zero sperm transfer to mated females was found in Frontinella pyramitela (Austad, 1982;Suter & Parkhill, 1990). Some evidence for sperm limitation applies in both species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…High first male precedence (Austad, 1982) Female is sperm limited if has only one copulation (Suter & Parkhill, 1990) Sperm transferred to mated females only if mating occurs less than 24 h after the first mating. Male detects female's virginity signal through courtship and pseudo-copulation (Suter, 1990) Nephila clavipes (Araneidae)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems obvious that the function of a prolonged copulation in general cannot be explained by prolonged sperm transfer only (Eberhard 1985;Suter & Parkhill 1990). During long copulations, apparent risks are accepted, which should favor brief mating (e. g. increased danger from predators or interruption by another male or by the female before sperm transfer is completed; Eberhard 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copulation duration may correlate with the amount of transferred sperm (Engqvist & Sauer 2003) and/or with fertilization success (Andres & Rivera 2000) but Schäfer & Uhl (2002) showed that longer copulations do not indicate higher fertilization rates in their study. The prolonged copulation duration in I. lannaianum could be explained by sperm competition hypotheses such as sperm precedence (Suter & Parkhill 1990;Elgar 1998) and/or by hypotheses of sexual selection by cryptic female choice (the male could initiate processes in the female during copulation which increase his chances of siring her offspring; Eberhard 1985Eberhard , 1996. The prolonged copulation could also serve as mate guarding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many animal groups, including spiders, the duration of copulation may show great inter-as well as intra-specific variation indicating that mating may serve other functions than a mere transfer of sperm necessary for fertilisation of the females' eggs (Jackson 1980;Suter and Parkhill 1990;reviews in Eberhard 1996;Elgar 1995Elgar , 1998. Though several factors including body size, predation risk and sexual cannibalism may influence copulation duration in spiders (Elgar 1995), the functions most often implied to explain extensive copulation durations is maximisation of the male's success in sperm competition (Parker 1970) or cryptic female choice (Eberhard 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%