2019
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness consequences of a non-recombiningsex-ratiodrive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild

Abstract: Understanding the pleiotropic consequences of gene drive systems on host fitness is essential to predict their spread through a host population. Here, we study sex-ratio (SR) X-chromosome drive in the fly Drosophila recens , where SR causes the death of Y-bearing sperm in male carriers. SR males only sire daughters, which all carry SR, thus giving the chromosome a transmission advantage. The prevalence of the SR chromosome appears stable, suggesting pleiotropic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lea & Unckless [25] found no reduced immune function associated with male meiotic drive, and Dyer & Hall [24] found no effects on female mating preferences or on longevity. Larner et al [23] and Dyer & Hall [24] then used the quantified fitness costs to parametrize population genetic models to predict equilibrium frequencies in nature. These predicted frequencies came close to observed frequencies.…”
Section: (B) Natural Drive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lea & Unckless [25] found no reduced immune function associated with male meiotic drive, and Dyer & Hall [24] found no effects on female mating preferences or on longevity. Larner et al [23] and Dyer & Hall [24] then used the quantified fitness costs to parametrize population genetic models to predict equilibrium frequencies in nature. These predicted frequencies came close to observed frequencies.…”
Section: (B) Natural Drive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These drivers act during sperm development to eliminate their competition, namely, non-driver carrying sperm, which promotes their own transmission. Finnegan et al [22], Larner et al [23], Dyer & Hall [24] and Lea & Unckless [25] measured fitness costs in males and females associated with their speciesspecific meiotic driver, in stalk-eyed flies Teleopsis dalmanni, in the fruit fly Drosophila pseudoobscura, in Drosophila recens and in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila affinis and Drosophila neotestacea, respectively. These fitness costs are apparent as reduced egg-to-adult viability [22], reduced offspring production in females [23,24] and reduced sperm competition success [24].…”
Section: (B) Natural Drive Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the "reduction principle" (16), this is also expected to occur around sex-ratio distorters. In line with this prediction, sexratio distorter loci often occur in regions of low recombination (17)(18)(19)(20), but we lack evidence for the direction of causality. The reduction principle is also expected to contribute to the formation of autosomal supergenes controlling other complex traits that involve epistatic interactions between two or more loci.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…One possibility is that the locus that confers susceptibility to drive is small, providing a small mutational target. However, many drivers impose broad costs across the genome (Dyer & Hall, 2019; Finnegan et al., 2019; Hamilton, 1967; Larner, Price, Holman, & Wedell, 2019; Zanders & Unckless, 2019), so loci throughout the genome are predicted to evolve to resist costly gene drives. Here, the lack of resistance mechanisms cannot be due to the small size of the mutational target, suggesting the involvement of other evolutionary constraints.…”
Section: Resistance To Gene Drives In Natural Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drivers may themselves have a range of harmful pleiotropic effects, or be in linkage with deleterious alleles (Burt & Trivers, 2006). Fitness loss is often observed in both males and females, especially when drivers are homozygous (Dyer & Hall, 2019; Finnegan et al., 2019; Hamilton, 1967; Larner et al., 2019; Zanders & Unckless, 2019).…”
Section: The Strength Of Selection For Resistance Across Gene Drive Smentioning
confidence: 99%