IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications 2016
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2016.7524390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FitLoc: Fine-grained and low-cost device-free localization for multiple targets over various areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to CSI, we also apply CrossSense to RSSI-based gesture recognition and compared it with Tele-pathicPhone [60]. We compare our roaming method to Fit-Loc [13], a WiFi signal translation approach for RSSI-based localization.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to CSI, we also apply CrossSense to RSSI-based gesture recognition and compared it with Tele-pathicPhone [60]. We compare our roaming method to Fit-Loc [13], a WiFi signal translation approach for RSSI-based localization.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wireless signal transfer has been exploited in prior work in indoor localization to translate wireless fingerprints between different areas within an environment. The transferring method employed by FitLoc [13] is the current stateof-the art. This experiment compares our roaming model against FitLoc's transferring method.…”
Section: Crosssense Versus Fitlocmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that an only K * number of nodes are finally used to create an SW-WSN. In (17) and 18 N(N − 1)))∑ i ≠ j h i j (k). The optimal link π i m * , j m * is introduced in the network iteratively till the localisation error reduces below a desired threshold.…”
Section: Optimal H-node Allocation Using a Heuristic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, alternative indoor localization techniques have to be invented and developed. Recently, there have been tremendous efforts on the research of indoor localization using various wireless medium or communications, for example, using WiFi signals [5][6][7][8][9][10], Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) [11][12][13][14], Bluetooth [15][16][17], Ultra-Wideband (UWB) [18,19], Acoustic Signals [20][21][22], Inertial Sensor/Measurement Unit (IMU) [23][24][25], or other wireless communication techniques. WiFi and Bluetooth based systems have been deployed in real applications more than the others in the last few decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%