Fit Testing Retrofitted Full-Face Snorkel Masks as a Form of Novel Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Toigo, Stephanie; Jacques, Michel; Razek, Tarek; Rajda, Ewa; Omelon, Sidney; Dankoff, F.; Tohme, Rami; Lefebvre, Patricia; Deckelbaum, Dan

doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.133

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Snorkelling masks were suggested for use as PPE during the supply chain shortage in the course of the first wave of the pandemic [ 23 , 24 ]. Several studies compared these masks to single-use N95 respirators and found comparable data to this trial: Good overall comfort, vision, perceived safety and communication were the greatest challenges [ 23 , 25 , 26 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Maleczek

Toemboel

Erp

et al. 2022

Wien Klin Wochenschr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Background The novel strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is highly contagious; therefore, special emphasis must be given to personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. Reusable elastomeric respirators were previously used in intensive care units (ICU). These respirators include full or half masks and devices modified to accommodate a filter. Although the general comfort of masks used in the ICU has been studied, data comparing multiple types of masks during a pandemic are missing. Methods A prospective randomized trial was conducted in an ICU. After standardized training, participants were randomized to use one of three mask types (full, half or snorkelling mask), each fitted with a filter equivalent to a class 3 particle-filtering half mask (FFP3) during one shift. The main outcomes were characteristics of using the mask itself (donning/doffing, quality of seal, cleaning), working conditions with the mask (vision, comfort, perceived safety, communication) and a subjective comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks. Results A total of 30 participants were included in the trial, randomized to 10 participants per group. The masks were worn 6.4 (4.5) times (mean SD) for a total duration of 132 (66) min per shift. The tested masks were rated 7 (2.6) (mean SD) in comparison to FFP2/3 on a Likert scale (0: worst, 10: best). Significant differences between the masks were found in respect to comfort (7/4/8), donning (8/7/9), overall rating (8/5/8) and comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks (9/7/9; full-, half, snorkelling mask). Conclusion Using reusable elastomeric masks is feasible in clinical practice. Full face masks were significantly better in terms of comfort, donning, overall rating and in comparison to single-use FFP2/3 masks.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Maleczek

Toemboel

Erp

et al. 2022

Wien Klin Wochenschr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In response to COVID-19 mask shortages, there has been a burgeoning output of research in mask design innovation. This work includes significant contributions to the knowledge of alternative face mask designs in areas of fit testing (Toigo et al, 2021), filtration testing (Pei et al, 2020), and methods of manufacturing such as 3D printing (Li et al, 2021). Very little research has examined HCWs' perceptions of new mask designs (Suen et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Activity and Usability Evaluation of Alternative Protective Face Mask Designs

Cloet

Arnold

et al. 2022

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aimed to evaluate the usability of three alternative protective face mask designs from the clinical perspective. In a remote study, dental students (n=38) with experience wearing N95 FFRs participated in a randomized wear trial with simulated activities to measure mask performance. A Likertscale survey instrument was developed to examine conditions of discomfort, fit stability, wear efficiency, and speech intelligibility. Survey results indicated the KN95 mask demonstrated the highest overall mask usability, followed by MNmask v2, and MNmask v1. While participants found MNmask v1 uncomfortable, the stability was rated highest during a head up and down activity ( M=3.54). Here, the KN95 mask had a lower rating ( M=3.36), revealing potential issues with a loose fit. MNmask v2 showed overall improvement from MNmask v1, but revealed complications with the paracord bands. The findings from this study may be applied broadly in improving mask performance and usability in protective face mask designs.

show abstract

Does the fit of personal protective equipment affect functional performance? A systematic review across occupational domains

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To explore the effect of personal protective equipment (PPE) fit on functional performance across a range of occupational domains. Background PPE introduces an ergonomic, human systems integration, and mass burden to the wearer, and these factors are thought to be amplified if PPE is ill-fitting. However, few studies have considered the role of fit (static, dynamic, and cognitive) when evaluating PPE-related performance detriments in occupational settings. Method A systematic literature review was conducted to identify relevant studies, which were then critically appraised based on methodological quality and collated to compare key findings and present evidence-based recommendations for future research directions across a range of occupational domains. Results 16 published studies met the inclusion criteria, 88% of which found that the fit of PPE had a statistically significant effect on occupational performance. Poorly sized PPE resulted in slower or increased reaction time; decreased range of motion or mobility; decreased endurance or tolerance; decreased pulmonary function; and altered muscle activation. Limited research met the inclusion criteria and those that did had risks of bias in methodology quality. Conclusion Future research evaluating the effect of PPE on performance in occupational settings should aim to recruit a more representative population; consider sex as a covariate; quantify and evaluate PPE fit and performance when integrated with all relevant equipment items; include outcome measures related to all three categories of fit (static, dynamic, cognitive); and assess performance of operationally relevant tasks.

show abstract

Fit Testing Retrofitted Full-Face Snorkel Masks as a Form of Novel Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Activity and Usability Evaluation of Alternative Protective Face Mask Designs

Does the fit of personal protective equipment affect functional performance? A systematic review across occupational domains

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About