FIT for FUNCTION: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundThe current state of evidence suggests that community-based exercise programs are beneficial in improving impairment, function, and health status, and are greatly needed for persons with stroke. However, limitations of these studies include risk of bias, feasibility, and cost issues.Methods/DesignThis single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 216 participants with stroke will compare the effectiveness of a 12-week YMCA community-based wellness program (FIT for FUNCTION) specifically designed for community-dwelling persons with stroke to persons who receive a standard YMCA membership. The primary outcome will be community reintegration using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index at 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include measurement of physical activity level using the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity and accelerometry; balance using the Berg Balance Scale; lower extremity function using the Short Physical Performance Battery; exercise capacity using the 6-min walk test; grip strength and isometric knee extension strength using hand held dynamometry; and health-related quality of life using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire. We are also assessing cardiovascular health and lipids; glucose and inflammatory markers will be collected following 12-h fast for total cholesterol, insulin, glucose, and glycated hemoglobin. Self-efficacy for physical activity will be assessed with a single question and self-efficacy for managing chronic disease will be assessed using the Stanford 6-item Scale. The Patient Activation Measure will be used to assess the patient’s level of knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. Healthcare utilization and costs will be evaluated. Group, time, and group × time interaction effects will be estimated using generalized linear models for continuous variables, including relevant baseline variables as covariates in the analysis that differ appreciably between groups at baseline. Cost data will be treated as non-parametric and analyzed using a Mann–Whitney U test.DiscussionThis is a RCT with broad study eligibility criteria intended to recruit a wide spectrum of individuals living in the community with stroke. If positive benefits are demonstrated, results will provide strong research evidence to support the implementation of structured, community-based exercise and education/self-management programs for a broad range of people living in the community with stroke.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02703805. Registered on 14 October 2014.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2416-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Development of GERAS DANcing for Cognition and Exercise (DANCE): a feasibility study

“…GERAS DANCE was delivered as a new program at the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) Hamilton Burlington Brantford as a part of the LiveWell series, which includes tailored rehabilitation programs for people with cancer [ 26 ] or heart disease [ 27 ]. GERAS DANCE was taught by a dance instructor who adhered to a standardized curriculum documented in a manual.…”

Health Promotion and Wellness in Neurologic Physical Therapy: Strategies to Advance Practice

“…Each model is defined, with delivery and documentation considerations in Table 4. Models may involve partnerships with evidence-based community programs, exercise professionals, caregivers (formal and informal), research studies, and community organizations 92,93. All models should include screening for lifestyle health behaviors, including physical activity (eg, structured exercise, sedentarism, and lifestyle physical activity), nutrition, smoking, sleep, and stress management.…”

Engaging community‐dwelling older adults as co‐developers in a public outdoor exercise facilities‐based physical activity education intervention: A mixed‐method participatory study in Hong Kong

“…The RAPA (Topolski et al., 2006) was used to measure PA levels. This tool has been commonly used in community‐based interventional research studies (Richardson et al., 2018). The RAPA questionnaire has two sections, RAPA 1 and RAPA 2 .…”