1980
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19800705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fistulation de l'estomac et contenus gastriques résiduels après ingestion d'un régime semi-purifié à base d'amidon de maïs chez le Porc

Abstract: Summary. Fistulation of the stomach and residual gastric contents after intake of a semipurified maize diet in the pig. Gastric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
12
1
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was surprising because the high-fat content of the HEM in the present experiment might have been expected to reduce the rate of emptying of digesta. However, the explanation for the difference between the present results and those of Cuber et al (1980) may lie in the diet :water value used which was 1 : 2.5 in the present experiment but only 1 : 1 (w/v) in that of Cuber et al (1980). This is supported by Low et al (1985) who found that digesta emptying rose as water intake (varying between 1.75 and 3.25 times DM intake) increased, although DM emptying remained unaffected.…”
Section: Digestacontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This was surprising because the high-fat content of the HEM in the present experiment might have been expected to reduce the rate of emptying of digesta. However, the explanation for the difference between the present results and those of Cuber et al (1980) may lie in the diet :water value used which was 1 : 2.5 in the present experiment but only 1 : 1 (w/v) in that of Cuber et al (1980). This is supported by Low et al (1985) who found that digesta emptying rose as water intake (varying between 1.75 and 3.25 times DM intake) increased, although DM emptying remained unaffected.…”
Section: Digestacontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…After weighing and sampling, the remainder of the digesta were returned to the pig via the gastric cannula. The stomach was not rinsed out before feeding as in the study of Cuber et a/. (1980) because this might alter gastric function, e.g.…”
Section: Collection Of Gastric Digestamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this very interesting animal model is a separate issue, differences. Gastric emptying of dry matter was steadier and more marked during a 7 h postprandial period when using gastric fistulation, and starch emptying was probably underestimated when measured in duodenal contents [41]. The question then arose as to whether the rate of gastric emptying was limiting intestinal carbohydrate absorption or not, suggesting that the rate of hydrolysis of the starch emptied from the stomach might also be the limiting factor.…”
Section: Gastric Emptyingmentioning
confidence: 99%