1993
DOI: 10.1038/363368a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fission yeast chkl protein kinase links the rad checkpoint pathway to cdc2

Abstract: The dependence of cell-cycle progression on the integrity of the genome has been described as checkpoint control. A number of mutants of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, selected for their sensitivity to DNA damage caused by radiation (rad mutants) or to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea (hus mutants) have been classified as checkpoint mutants because they fail to arrest the cell cycle in response to DNA damage or incompletely replicated DNA. Coupling of the checkpoint pathways that monitor D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
396
1
9

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 449 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
396
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely to be the case since equal amounts of hchk1 protein were detected in AT1ABR and C3ABR but there is a defect in activation of chk1 in AT1ABR cells (Khanna et al, unpublished). Previous data demonstrate that a gainof-function caused by overexpression of chk1 alone in S. pombe acting downstream of the ATM homologue rad3, leads to G2 arrest (Al-Khodairy et al, 1994;Ford et al, 1994;Walworth et al, 1993). In addition moderate overexpression of chk1 in S. pombe rad mutants, at levels that do not e ect mitotic entry, restored partially their level of survival after DNA damage (Walworth et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is unlikely to be the case since equal amounts of hchk1 protein were detected in AT1ABR and C3ABR but there is a defect in activation of chk1 in AT1ABR cells (Khanna et al, unpublished). Previous data demonstrate that a gainof-function caused by overexpression of chk1 alone in S. pombe acting downstream of the ATM homologue rad3, leads to G2 arrest (Al-Khodairy et al, 1994;Ford et al, 1994;Walworth et al, 1993). In addition moderate overexpression of chk1 in S. pombe rad mutants, at levels that do not e ect mitotic entry, restored partially their level of survival after DNA damage (Walworth et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cells with the chk1 sp Δ mutation are not as sensitive to DNA damage as cells with a deletion of any of the checkpoint rad genes, suggesting that the checkpoint Rad proteins also have a Chk1 sp independent role, perhaps in activating DNA repair [14,30]. Furthermore, deletion of Chk1 sp does not affect the S/M checkpoint, indicating that the checkpoint rad genes have other targets in the S/M checkpoint, as discussed below [14,30]. Chk1 sp is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage and this phosphorylation depends on the checkpoint Rad proteins [31].…”
Section: The Schizosaccharomyces Pombe G 2 Dna Damage Checkpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Chk1 sp is not phosphorylated in response to HU [31]. While this does not necessarily mean that Chk1 sp is not activated by HU, Chk1 sp is not normally required for an HU induced arrest [14,30]. Instead, the protein kinase Cds1 sp plays the analogous role in the S/M checkpoint [73••,74••,75].…”
Section: The S Pombe S/m Replication Checkpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O número em parênteses corresponde ao ano de publicação do trabalho e foi adaptada da revisão de Ljungman, 2000. 1 -(Muller 1927); 2 - (Hollaender e Claus, 1936); 3 - (Kelner 1949); 4 - (Watson e Crick, 1953); 5 - (Kanazir e Errera, 1954);6 -(RupertT et al, 1958);7 -(Beukers e Berends, 1960); 8 - (Masters e Pardee, 1962); 9 - (Boyce e Howard-Flanders, 1964;Setlow e Carrier, 1964); 10 - (Holliday 1964); 11 - (Rupp e Howard-Flanders, 1968); 12 -(J E Cleaver 1968); 13 - (Lindahl 1974); 14 - (Witkin 1974);15 -(Wagner e Meselson, 1976); 16 - (Lane e Crawford, 1979;Linzer e Levine, 1979); 17 - (Wilson et al, 1982); 18 - (Mellon et al, 1987);19 -(Kastan et al 1991);20 -(Kastan et al 1992); 21 - (Walworth et al, 1993); 22 - (Fishel et al 1993);23 -(van der Kemp et al 1996); 24 - (Rogakou et al 1998); 25 - (Matsuoka et al, 1998);26 -(Masutani et al 1999); 27 - (Tibbetts et al 1999);28 -(de Boer et al 2002); 29 - (Kannouche et al, , 2004); 30 - (Bartkova et al 2005;Gorgoulis et al 2005); 31 - (Matsuoka et al 2007;Stokes et al 2007); 32 - ( Sugasawa et al 2009) .…”
Section: Luz Uv E Consequências Dos Fotoprodutosunclassified