1971
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(71)90449-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fission threshold energies in the actinide region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of these numerical uncertainties in the values of /I2 and /14, we can thus conclude that one may use the relations (11) and (12) together with the radii constants (13) to calculate the charge multipole moments directly from the equilibrium deformations of the potential. In detailed comparisons with the experiment, however, it might be wise to calculate the moments from the actual proton distributions, as is done in sect.…”
Section: Moments Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these numerical uncertainties in the values of /I2 and /14, we can thus conclude that one may use the relations (11) and (12) together with the radii constants (13) to calculate the charge multipole moments directly from the equilibrium deformations of the potential. In detailed comparisons with the experiment, however, it might be wise to calculate the moments from the actual proton distributions, as is done in sect.…”
Section: Moments Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] parameters, with and without shell corrections taken into account, respectively. The dash-dotted curve represents the calculation through the use of Pauli and Ledergerber [12] parameters without the account of shell corrections. The experimental points are from [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]; the spread limits of the results of the measurements taken by different authors are also shown…”
Section: Calculation For the Fissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases we have plotted our predictions for several nuclides for which data are not available. Though the thorium and protoactinium isotopes were excluded while fitting, we explain the usually "anomalous" thorium isotopes [3] very well both for VA and V B while the previous calculations are discrepant by about 1.5 MeV for the inner barrier height. For the second minima our values are around 3 MeV and as such are lower than the required values of about 4.5 MeV.…”
Section: V=v(e)-v(~o) and ===(E)-~(eo)mentioning
confidence: 80%