2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fission product release from nuclear fuel I. Physical modelling in the ASTEC code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These plateaus and ramps could be associated to the creation and destruction of chemical phases which control the release of FP under specific conditions. Nevertheless, scenario codes for source-term estimation such as the ASTEC Code [24], [25] normally assume that volatile FP such as iodine and caesium behave as gases and that their release is purely diffusive. As for Ba and Mo, some reactions are considered but the intermediary compounds have never been observed experimentally.…”
Section: Scientific Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plateaus and ramps could be associated to the creation and destruction of chemical phases which control the release of FP under specific conditions. Nevertheless, scenario codes for source-term estimation such as the ASTEC Code [24], [25] normally assume that volatile FP such as iodine and caesium behave as gases and that their release is purely diffusive. As for Ba and Mo, some reactions are considered but the intermediary compounds have never been observed experimentally.…”
Section: Scientific Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the effective diffusion coefficient does not depend on the fuel Oxygen/Metal (O/M) ratio, as it is the case in some severe accident codes [18]. This dependency stems from the decoupling of FP thermochemistry and fuel oxidation/reduction modeling in these codes.…”
Section: Extension To Severe Accident Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second aspect that is generally lacking in SA codes compared to fuel performance codes is the precise description of the irradiated fuel state before the SA scenario. SA codes generally consider the fuel pellet as a single entity characterized by an average burnup and FP content [12] [18]. While this hypothesis is convenient to reduce the computational time, it is far from the fuel state after irradiation in a commercial Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASTEC contains several modules aimed at modelling various aspects of SA progression. The ELSA module within ASTEC simulates fission product release from defective fuel, which is informed by thermodynamic calculations including 42 chemical elements [80]. The handling of fission products are partitioned in three categories: volatiles, semi-volatiles, and low-volatiles [17].…”
Section: Astec Astec (Accident Source Term Evaluation Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the work of Cubicciotti [73] and MELCOR, a Gibbs energy minimizer is not directly coupled to ASTEC, but rather a series of equilibrium constants are used instead. An empirical correlation relating temperature and oxygen partial pressure is used to model fuel stoichiometry, x in UO 2±x [80]. A number of correlations are used to capture specific chemical reactions (e.g., CeO 2(s) = Ce g + O 2(g) ), which are temperature dependent and sometimes include activity coefficients to account for non-ideal behaviour [81].…”
Section: Astec Astec (Accident Source Term Evaluation Codementioning
confidence: 99%