1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.34.1353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fission probes of sub-barrier fusion cross section enhancements and spin distribution broadening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental data are taken from [43] and [44] for the first reaction and from [45] and [46] for the second one. Dotted and solid curves correspond to one-dimensional and channel coupling calculations of the capture cross sections (see Section 3).…”
Section: Decay Of Excited Sh Nucleus and Its Survival Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data are taken from [43] and [44] for the first reaction and from [45] and [46] for the second one. Dotted and solid curves correspond to one-dimensional and channel coupling calculations of the capture cross sections (see Section 3).…”
Section: Decay Of Excited Sh Nucleus and Its Survival Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heavy-ion induced fission fragment angular distribution measurements carried out at sub-barrier energies for several systems with Th, U and Np as targets have exhibited anomalously large values of anisotropies (A) as compared to the standard saddle point statistical model (SSPSM) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This feature has been observed for several projectiles ranging from 11 B to 19 F and appears to be independent of the entrance channel mass-asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For simplicity, only target deformation is considered. It is expected that l 2 should be proportional to G. In order to test the idea whether the l 2 values extracted from measured anisotropies are proportional to their respective G values, for all the available systems, the corresponding G values have been computed using expression [2]. The deformation parameters β have been taken from Raman et al [22].…”
Section: Plausible Reasons For the Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of 242 Cm was 0.46 mg at the beginning of the measurements. The 242 Cm sources were 30 mm in diameter and located in the center [14], 4 Videbaek et al [13], --results of calculation [12].…”
Section: Ramentioning
confidence: 99%