2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.014601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fission fragment mass yields and total kinetic energy release in neutron-induced fission of U233 from thermal energies to 40 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 4, we show our data, as well as comparisons to other 237 Np (n,f) reaction data and the GEF model. The overall trend of decreasing TKE with increasing excitation is consistent with other fast neutron TKE studies of actinides [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. While the TKE release for the lowest energy neutrons is approximately linear, a first order log 10 (En) polynomial fit is needed to describe the fast neutron energy region (En> 1 MeV).…”
Section: A Tke Vs Ensupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Figure 4, we show our data, as well as comparisons to other 237 Np (n,f) reaction data and the GEF model. The overall trend of decreasing TKE with increasing excitation is consistent with other fast neutron TKE studies of actinides [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. While the TKE release for the lowest energy neutrons is approximately linear, a first order log 10 (En) polynomial fit is needed to describe the fast neutron energy region (En> 1 MeV).…”
Section: A Tke Vs Ensupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this figure we show our data, the GEF model [20], and the 240,242 Pu(n,f) data measured by Vorob'eva et al [16,38]. The overall trend of decreasing TKE with increasing excitation is consistent with other fast neutron TKE studies of actinides [7,9,[13][14][15]39]. A second order log 10 polynomial fit best describes the TKE vs. E n relationship.…”
Section: Comparison With Gef and Cgmfsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It has a high efficiency, covering a solid angle of nearly 4π sr as well as superior energy resolution, typically in the range of ∼ 0.5 − 1 MeV for fission fragments [27]. TFGIC detectors have been used in many double-energy style measurements in the past [7,[28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: B Detector and Daqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy calibration of the anode pulse height spectra was achieved using the method described in references [33,43]. The centroids of the light and heavy peaks in each anode pulse height spectrum for a subset of events with E n ≤ 1 MeV were normalized to the absolute values of E i reported by Naqvi et al at an incident neutron energy of E n = 0.8 MeV [5] reduced by the requisite PHD of the TFGIC for the mean post-neutron evaporation mass.…”
Section: Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%