2013
DOI: 10.1111/add.12145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishy curves: a case of bias and confounding?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodological fallacies suggested are: [5,[19][20][21][22] bias in selfreported AC measurement [23], publication bias [19], confounding bias, AC being irrefutably linked to certain socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics known to affect cardio-vascular events (CVE) [21,24]; systematic misclassification error, known also as abstainers'/sick quitters' fallacy [12,25], leading to a reverse causality bias [20]; and residual confounding bias that is often a result of dodgy AC operationalization [2,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological fallacies suggested are: [5,[19][20][21][22] bias in selfreported AC measurement [23], publication bias [19], confounding bias, AC being irrefutably linked to certain socio-economic and lifestyle characteristics known to affect cardio-vascular events (CVE) [21,24]; systematic misclassification error, known also as abstainers'/sick quitters' fallacy [12,25], leading to a reverse causality bias [20]; and residual confounding bias that is often a result of dodgy AC operationalization [2,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%