2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-020-01233-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishing history of the East Baltic during the Holocene according to underwater multiperiod riverine site Kaltanėnai, northeastern Lithuania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, their larger collections in inland sites are known from Šarnelė 35 and Žemaitiškė 2 36 sites, whereas the latest AMS 14 C analysis of one similar, but with a much slenderer tang, point from Kaltanėnai belong to the 3516-3360 cal BC. 37 Parallels for conical type bone points from Palanga site are not common in the territory of Lithuania, while analogies for plain points can be found in many Late Holocene sites. However, the plain point from Palanga is missing its lower part, therefore, it is difficult to speculate as to its former final shape.…”
Section: Tool Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, their larger collections in inland sites are known from Šarnelė 35 and Žemaitiškė 2 36 sites, whereas the latest AMS 14 C analysis of one similar, but with a much slenderer tang, point from Kaltanėnai belong to the 3516-3360 cal BC. 37 Parallels for conical type bone points from Palanga site are not common in the territory of Lithuania, while analogies for plain points can be found in many Late Holocene sites. However, the plain point from Palanga is missing its lower part, therefore, it is difficult to speculate as to its former final shape.…”
Section: Tool Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to Garnys, it has a very wide chronology from the Late Mesolithic to the early modern period. The finds have already been discussed (Piličiauskas et al 2020). Eight human bone fragments were collected from the riverbed.…”
Section: Materials and Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failure continues a series of previous unsuccessful dating attempts and strongly suggests that at Kaltanėnai due to unknown reasons the state of preservation of human bones is worse compared to that of the animal remains. Almost all bone tools made of various animal species were successfully dated by Piličiauskas et al (2020). The human bones at Kaltanėnai belonged to at least two individuals.…”
Section: Chronology Of Human Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first radiocarbon dating of stray bone and antler harpoons from Lake Lubāns (Latvia) indicated the continuation of Final Paleolithic technology in the Early Holocene, informing discussion of the transition between the Final Paleolithic and the earliest Mesolithic (Meadows et al 2014). More chronological investigations of single osseous artifacts from the eastern Baltic followed, creating typo-chronological models for particular Late Pleistocene and Holocene organic implement technologies (Ivanovaitė et al 2018; Philippsen et al 2019; Zagorska et al 2019; Rimkus et al 2019; Piličiauskas et al 2020). These studies provided many important insights, involving such aspects as when the eastern Baltic region was settled at the end of the Late Glacial and how certain tool types developed in the Holocene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%