2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6cy02623k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishing for the right catalyst for the cross-metathesis reaction of methyl oleate with 2-methyl-2-butene

Abstract: A comparison of the reactivity of different ruthenium-based complexes in the cross-metathesis reaction of methyl oleate was presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilization of renewable resources by the use of olefin metathesis reactions is a research topic of many groups including ours …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilization of renewable resources by the use of olefin metathesis reactions is a research topic of many groups including ours …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[87] Ethenolysis of olefinic substrates from renewable resources Utilizationo fr enewable resources by the use of olefin metathesis reactions is ar esearch topic of many groups [88] including ours. [89][90][91] In the light of recent publications, ethenolysis emerges as a great methodf or valorisation of oleic acid derivatives. [21,35,[92][93][94] Logically,w ed ecided to explore possible use of Ru-3 in the ethenolysis reaction of ethyl oleate(S-20,S cheme 7, Figure 12).…”
Section: Scheme6ethylene-based [Ru] Initiation and Decomposition Patmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with this result the GC/MS analysis gave a molecular weight of 150 corresponding to C11H18. ene revealed that both regioselectivities could be obtained depending on the nature of the catalyst [30]. The cross-metathesis of a sterically hindered vinylheterocyclic substrate with 2-methylbut-2-ene in the presence of the catalyst Ru2 yielded a mixture of the two regioisomers in a disubstituted/trisubstituted double bond ratio of 2.4/1.0 [31].…”
Section: Revised Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major drawback of CM reactions is their lack of selectivity, so that the most common outcome is a statistical mixture of all the possible CM products. To overcome this low product selectivity, empirical categorization of olefin reactivity or usage of co‐catalyst such as CuI were proposed and, recently, a large set of various Ru based catalysts for CM was screened to increase the selectivity toward the desired products …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%