Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2013 2013
DOI: 10.5244/c.27.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisher Vector Faces in the Wild

Abstract: Several recent papers on automatic face verification have significantly raised the performance bar by developing novel, specialised representations that outperform standard features such as SIFT for this problem.This paper makes two contributions: first, and somewhat surprisingly, we show that Fisher vectors on densely sampled SIFT features, i.e. an off-the-shelf object recognition representation, are capable of achieving state-of-the-art face verification performance on the challenging "Labeled Faces in the W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
407
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
407
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, compared with other stae-of-the-art methods, our model's accuracy is higher than DeepFace and DeepID2 for single net. Also, our model outperforms the result of WebFace and other traditional methods, High-dim LBP [12] and Fisher Vector Face [13]. VGG-Face is slightly superior than ours with an extremely complex network which has about 167 times number of parameters than our model.…”
Section: Fig3 Weight Value Percentage Distributionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Besides, compared with other stae-of-the-art methods, our model's accuracy is higher than DeepFace and DeepID2 for single net. Also, our model outperforms the result of WebFace and other traditional methods, High-dim LBP [12] and Fisher Vector Face [13]. VGG-Face is slightly superior than ours with an extremely complex network which has about 167 times number of parameters than our model.…”
Section: Fig3 Weight Value Percentage Distributionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A filter can be visualized by using gradient ascent to find an input image that maximizes the filter's output activation [21]. Using this technique we generated the images shown in figure 14, which provide visualization of the filters in the second convolutional layer of the CNN+LSTM model.…”
Section: Track Parameter Estimation With Lstms and Cnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches had been dedicated to solve the face recognition problem with the existence of one or more types of these variations. Recently, due to the improvement of the face and facial landmark detection accuracy as well as the increase of the computational power, researches [4,27,2] show that we can achieve near-human performance on face verification benchmark taken in the unconstrainted environments such as Labeled Faces in the Wild dataset (LFW) [11]. However, as LFW dataset contains large variations in pose, illumination, and expression, it contains little variation in aging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%