2011
DOI: 10.1239/jap/1318940471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisher information and statistical inference for phase-type distributions

Abstract: This paper is concerned with statistical inference for both continuous and discrete phasetype distributions. We consider maximum likelihood estimation, where traditionally the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm has been employed. Certain numerical aspects of this method are revised and we provide an alternative method for dealing with the E-step. We also compare the EM algorithm to a direct Newton-Raphson optimization of the likelihood function. As one of the main contributions of the paper, we provide fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that we have deliberately omitted inference for the PH parameters π and T. The reason being, this is a particularly difficult task due to the nonidentifiability issue of PH distributions, namely that several representations can result in the same model. Papers such as Bladt et al (2011) and Zhang et al, 2021 provide methods of recovering the information matrix for these parameters, but the validity of the conclusions drawn from such approach are not fully understood. Consequently, and similarly to other regression models, we will only perform estimation on the regression coefficients themselves and use the distributional parameters merely as a vehicle to obtain β.…”
Section: Inference For Phase-type Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that we have deliberately omitted inference for the PH parameters π and T. The reason being, this is a particularly difficult task due to the nonidentifiability issue of PH distributions, namely that several representations can result in the same model. Papers such as Bladt et al (2011) and Zhang et al, 2021 provide methods of recovering the information matrix for these parameters, but the validity of the conclusions drawn from such approach are not fully understood. Consequently, and similarly to other regression models, we will only perform estimation on the regression coefficients themselves and use the distributional parameters merely as a vehicle to obtain β.…”
Section: Inference For Phase-type Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason being, this is a particularly difficult task due to the non-identifiability issue of PH distributions, namely that several representations can result in the same model. Papers such as Bladt et al (2011); Zhang et al (2021) provide methods of recovering the information matrix for these parameters, but the validity of the conclusions drawn from such approach are not fully understood. Consequently, and similarly to other regression models, we will only perform estimation on the regression coefficients themselves, and use the distributional parameters merely as a vehicle to obtain β β β.…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asmussen et al (1996) have presented a procedure for fitting CPH distributions via the EM algorithm. Using uniformization method, Bladt et al (2011) developed an alternative method to compute the E-step in the EM algorithm, and is called as EM unif algorithm.…”
Section: Estimation Of Parameters Of Cph Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asmussen et al (1996) introduced expectation maximization (EM) algorithm for fitting phase-type distribution. Expectation Maximization uniformization (EM unif) algorithm was developed by Bladt et al (2011) as an improvement over EM algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%