2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish trophic level and the similarity of non-specific larval parasite assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also display larger surface areas for parasite attachment and can ingest larger quantities of food, resulting in a higher exposure to infective stages (Guégan et al , ; Poulin, ; Valtonen et al , ). Larger fishes can also feed on larger prey items, increasing the number and broadening the set of potential parasites (Timi et al , , ). Therefore, fish length must be considered in comparisons among samples from different localities to avoid attributing ontogenetic variability in parasite loads to a locality effect, leading to misinterpretation of spatial patterns and stock structure (Cantatore & Timi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also display larger surface areas for parasite attachment and can ingest larger quantities of food, resulting in a higher exposure to infective stages (Guégan et al , ; Poulin, ; Valtonen et al , ). Larger fishes can also feed on larger prey items, increasing the number and broadening the set of potential parasites (Timi et al , , ). Therefore, fish length must be considered in comparisons among samples from different localities to avoid attributing ontogenetic variability in parasite loads to a locality effect, leading to misinterpretation of spatial patterns and stock structure (Cantatore & Timi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diphyllobothrium species were more aggregated in trout with many larval specimens in the largest fish. Increasing amounts of evidence suggest that trophic level can structure parasite communities in fish (Poulin & Valtonen, 2001;Marcogliese, 2002;Timi et al, 2011, Strona & Lafferty, 2013, and higher aggregations of trophically transmitted parasites can be the result of a higher position in the trophic chain (Lester, 2012). Shifts in trophic level during the ontogeny of a fish should, therefore, be followed by an increase in trophically transmitted parasites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the dominance of generalist parasites in many of the fish species examined, greater abundances of zooplankton and greater foraging would ultimately result in higher abundances of even larval generalist parasites as observed in higher trophic level fishes in the Argentine Sea (Timi et al 2011). It is possible that fish did not remain in the hotspots long enough to reflect differences through their trophically transmitted parasites.…”
Section: Hotspotsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the dominance of generalist parasites that use a diversity of zooplankton and fish to complete their life cycles could mask subtle differences in food web structure, parasite species and their abundances were sufficiently different to result in significantly different parasite communities among many host species. However, even with assemblages of only larval stages of generalist parasites, with differences in abundances, it has been possible to determine fish trophic levels in the northern Argentine Sea (Timi et al 2011). …”
Section: Trophic Structure Of the Pelagic Food Webmentioning
confidence: 99%