2009
DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2009.9635391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish passage over hydraulic structures in Midwestern Rivers of the USA

Abstract: The main objective of this study was to examine the hydraulic performance of knickpoint-control structures (i.e., riprap weirs, grouted-riprap weirs, baffled and non-baffled fish ladders) to facilitate unimpeded fish passage. The hydraulic performance of these structures, located in Midwestern streams, was evaluated by determining the mean and turbulent flow characteristics in the vicinity of the structures via detailed field tests. Non-intrusive mean flow measurements were performed using a 3-dimensional side… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These problems are commonly associated with private and public infrastructure such as dams, culverts, water diversions, and grade control structures (Castro-Santos et al, 2009;Dermisis and Papanicolaou, 2009;Norman et al, 2009;Castro-Santos and Haro, 2010;Martens and Connolly, 2010;Hall et al, 2011). Often this infrastructure disrupts or prohibits natural fish movement patterns, fragments fish habitat, degrades populations, and influences overall biotic structure of aquatic systems (Pratt et al, 2009;Bestgen et al, 2010;Bouska and Paukert, 2010;Castro-Santos and Haro, 2010;Hall et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These problems are commonly associated with private and public infrastructure such as dams, culverts, water diversions, and grade control structures (Castro-Santos et al, 2009;Dermisis and Papanicolaou, 2009;Norman et al, 2009;Castro-Santos and Haro, 2010;Martens and Connolly, 2010;Hall et al, 2011). Often this infrastructure disrupts or prohibits natural fish movement patterns, fragments fish habitat, degrades populations, and influences overall biotic structure of aquatic systems (Pratt et al, 2009;Bestgen et al, 2010;Bouska and Paukert, 2010;Castro-Santos and Haro, 2010;Hall et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of the aforementioned factors, turbulence has received increased scrutiny because forces imparted onto fish from eddies potentially can modify fish swimming rates, which can force them to accelerate through particular areas, or may affect a fish's position and balance, which can cause a fish to decrease its speed or to become disoriented (Dermisis and Papanicolaou, 2009). Fish also may expend extra energy when swimming through turbulent regions, especially if there is non-periodicity in the turbulence (Lacey et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papanicolaou and Dermisis () and Dermisis and Papanicolaou () studied the hydraulic characteristics of GCS in numerous western Iowa streams, including Walnut and Turkey Creeks, during fall and spring seasons, to assess a range of flow conditions. Twenty‐two GCSs (Table , Figure ) were selected for determination of hydraulic characteristics, including eight riprap weirs (Figure A), ten grouted riprap weirs (Figure B, C) and four fish ladder weirs (baffled and unbaffled) (Figure D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hungry Canyons Alliance, a locally formed and managed regional organization of counties in western Iowa, and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources commissioned multidisciplinary research (Larson et al ., ; Papanicolaou and Dermisis, ; Litvan et al ., ‐c; Dermisis and Papanicolaou, ) to determine (i) effects of GCS on the biophysical nature of western Iowa streams, (ii) the GCS slope striking the optimum balance between allowing fish passage while minimizing construction costs, and (iii) effects of GCS on fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages. The purpose of this review is to synthesize results of this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the documented research, fish passage has focused primarily anadromous fish and to a lesser extent residential fish (Dermisis et al 2009). Common North American anadromous species include species of shad, salmon, Atlantic sturgeon, alewife and lamprey.…”
Section: Fish Passagementioning
confidence: 99%