2008
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2008153420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish immune response to Myxozoan parasites

Abstract: Summary :Myxozoan parasites are responsible for important economic losses among fisheries and aquaculture industries, and hence the high interest in studying the immune response of fish against them. The most important data available concerning the immune response of fish against myxosporeans are reviewed, with emphasis on the different innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, their relationship with natural and acquired resistance and the strategies to control and prevent myxosporoses. Cellular effectors (lymph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the recovery process following a PKD infection seemed to be influenced by the concurrent parasitic disease. The fish immune response against myxozoan infections in general consists of cellular components, like macrophages, lymphocytes, and granulocytes, and of humoral components, like lysozyme, peroxidases, complement pathways and specific antibodies (Sitjà-Bobadilla 2008). It is possible that this immune response is influenced and possibly retarded by the concurrent infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the recovery process following a PKD infection seemed to be influenced by the concurrent parasitic disease. The fish immune response against myxozoan infections in general consists of cellular components, like macrophages, lymphocytes, and granulocytes, and of humoral components, like lysozyme, peroxidases, complement pathways and specific antibodies (Sitjà-Bobadilla 2008). It is possible that this immune response is influenced and possibly retarded by the concurrent infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to understand the possible underlying mechanisms involved in the greater progression of the infection in 66VO fish, we undertook a series of detailed studies of gut immunology and fish immune response in fish fed such diets and confronted with this myxosporean. Production of specific antibodies has been described for several myxosporean infections [17] and circulating antibodies against Enteromyxum scophthalmi produced by turbot [18] are involved in resistance to re-infection to survivor fish [19]. Furthermore, in E. scophthalmi-experimentally infected turbot, an increase of Igþ cells occurred in the intestine, whereas a decrease was observed in lymphohaematopoietic tissues [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several humoral and cellular factors are activated in case of infection. Cytotoxic effector molecules, such as reactive nitrogen species, are mainly produced by activated phagocytes [6], and have been demonstrated in infections caused by other myxosporeans, as in Enteromyxum leei-infected sharp snout sea bream [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%