Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3419635.3419643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish Image Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liang et al [3] 2020 Shape features Convolutional neural network 98.1% Knausgård et al [4] 2022 Generic features Convolutional neural network 87.74% Böer et al [5] 2021 Morphological features DeepLabV3 and PSPNet models 96.8% Iqbal et al [6] 2019 Generic features AlexNet model 90.48% Cui et al [7] 2020 Generic features Convolutional neural network 97.5% Zhang et al [8] 2021 Morphological features Convolutional neural network 96% Montalbo and Hernandez [9] 2019 Generic features VGG16 DCNN Model 99% Mathur and Goel [10] 2021 Generic features ResNet-50 Model 98.44% Ahmed et al [11] 2022 Statistical & color features SVM classifier 94.12% Lan et al [12] 2020 Shape and texture features Deep CNN 89% Allken et al [13] 2018 Shape features A deep learning neural network 94% Andayani et al [14] 2019 In this paper, RBFNN and SVM techniques for fish image classification were presented and evaluated against the fish shape features. The contribution of this work can be summarized as: -Extracted robust features for fish image classification.…”
Section: 6%mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liang et al [3] 2020 Shape features Convolutional neural network 98.1% Knausgård et al [4] 2022 Generic features Convolutional neural network 87.74% Böer et al [5] 2021 Morphological features DeepLabV3 and PSPNet models 96.8% Iqbal et al [6] 2019 Generic features AlexNet model 90.48% Cui et al [7] 2020 Generic features Convolutional neural network 97.5% Zhang et al [8] 2021 Morphological features Convolutional neural network 96% Montalbo and Hernandez [9] 2019 Generic features VGG16 DCNN Model 99% Mathur and Goel [10] 2021 Generic features ResNet-50 Model 98.44% Ahmed et al [11] 2022 Statistical & color features SVM classifier 94.12% Lan et al [12] 2020 Shape and texture features Deep CNN 89% Allken et al [13] 2018 Shape features A deep learning neural network 94% Andayani et al [14] 2019 In this paper, RBFNN and SVM techniques for fish image classification were presented and evaluated against the fish shape features. The contribution of this work can be summarized as: -Extracted robust features for fish image classification.…”
Section: 6%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al [11] used machine learning-based classification model support vector machine (SVM) for fish infection and they obtained an accyracy rate of 94.12%. Inception-V3 deep learning algorithm for fish image classification is proposed in [12]. To overcome the problems due to low-quality images and small data, they used data augmentation improve the prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fish detection and classification discussed in [27] mandates the selection of parameters such as color features, statistical texture features, and waveletbased texture features of the color and texture sub-images through high-resolution images to obtain optimum performance. The Inception-V3 network-based fish classification depicted in [28] provides less accuracy as the images are of low resolution. The fish classification in an underwater vehicle, as discussed in [29], depicts the usage of three optimization algorithms in the convolutional network, thereby leading to complexity in classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such existing methodologies of sorting may not yield fruitful results, and may even spoil the fish, thereby lowering its quality. The developments of image processing techniques have aided the advancement of morphometric methods for species identification [12]. The use of an image-based system allows for the automated separation of fish species, making the process more efficient and quicker, and causing less spoilage to the fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%