Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1051/alr/2010013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish growth and health aspects of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) reared in standard vs. high rate algal pond recirculation systems

Abstract: -Recirculation aquaculture system (RAS) is the type of land-based aquaculture production that interferes the least with the environment, particularly due to low effluent volume and overall water requirement. Water reuse, sometimes limited by the accumulation of waste products excreted by fish, can be improved by incorporating another biotechnical component in the form of high rate algal pond (RAS+HRAP), thus adding to the economy and self sustainability of the system. Our goal was to evaluate whether rearing f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The salinity in the RAS ranged from 34.1 to 38.8 (37.8 ± 1.3) but was higher in the outdoor algal raceways and oyster tanks. PH in the RAS ranged from 6.3 to 7.7 (7.2 ± 0.2), in optimal range for seabass rearing (Mladineo et al, 2010). It was higher in the algal raceways, ranging, from 8.8 to 10.5 (9.9 ± 0.4), and in the oyster tanks, ranging from 8.2 to 9.6 (8.7 ± 0.3).…”
Section: Environmental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The salinity in the RAS ranged from 34.1 to 38.8 (37.8 ± 1.3) but was higher in the outdoor algal raceways and oyster tanks. PH in the RAS ranged from 6.3 to 7.7 (7.2 ± 0.2), in optimal range for seabass rearing (Mladineo et al, 2010). It was higher in the algal raceways, ranging, from 8.8 to 10.5 (9.9 ± 0.4), and in the oyster tanks, ranging from 8.2 to 9.6 (8.7 ± 0.3).…”
Section: Environmental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Fish were acclimatized with a commercial diet for one month, when all groups showed a feeding behavior consistent with the stocking density and development stage [39,41]. Three tanks were used for each experimental formulation (VEG-control, SPI, YEA, INS, and PAP), and one tank was used for the commercial condition COM.…”
Section: Fish and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four thousand sea bass fingerlings were produced at Ifremer laboratory L−3AS (Palavas-les Flots, France). After a selection, 848 fish (19.32 ± 1.6 g) were tagged and randomly assigned to sixteen one cubic meter tanks (53 fish/tank) in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) ( Figure S1) [39]. Tank temperature was adjusted at 23.2 ± 0.7 • C all over the experiment.…”
Section: Fish and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fish body weight coefficient of variation was lower at the end of the experiment for all treatments and contributed to fish population homogeneity. However, the M 8 -SGR and -FCR were better under limited feeding conditions than in previous experiments in the same facility (Deviller et al 2004;Mladineo et al 2010). All these parameters indicate that our feeding strategy was correct.…”
Section: Experimental Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 44%