1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0075-9511(99)80050-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish communities and migrations in the vicinity of fishways in a regulated river (Enz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results contrast with reports from other fishways in which chub and roach have been observed successfully ascending at a higher efficiency than perch (Lucas et al 1999a;Knaepkens et al 2005). Furthermore, tench are rarely observed using fishways (Prignon et al 1998;Jansen et al 1999), and they would not have been expected to have a high efficiency, given their low critical swimming speed (Wolter & Arlinghaus 2003). Both burbot and pike (Esox lucius L.) have been observed to ascend nature-like fishways, Denil-and vertical slot fishways (Schwalme et al 1985;Degerman 2001), but their low usage in the present study may be an effect of the low number of tagged fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results contrast with reports from other fishways in which chub and roach have been observed successfully ascending at a higher efficiency than perch (Lucas et al 1999a;Knaepkens et al 2005). Furthermore, tench are rarely observed using fishways (Prignon et al 1998;Jansen et al 1999), and they would not have been expected to have a high efficiency, given their low critical swimming speed (Wolter & Arlinghaus 2003). Both burbot and pike (Esox lucius L.) have been observed to ascend nature-like fishways, Denil-and vertical slot fishways (Schwalme et al 1985;Degerman 2001), but their low usage in the present study may be an effect of the low number of tagged fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Fishways can function as rearing and/or spawning habitat for different fish species as has been previously suggested for species like bullhead (Cottus gobio L.), burbot, chub, grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.), European eel, roach, trout, salmon and signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) (Jungwirth 1996;Eberstaller et al 1998;Jansen et al 1999;Degerman 2001;Slavik & Bartos 2002;Knaepkens et al 2005). In our study, we documented relatively long-term use of the fishways, presumably as rearing habitats, for several species, but it is not known whether any of the species spawn inside the fishways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, its critical swimming speed (U crit ) only varies between 0AE15-0AE34 m s )1 (Pavlov 1989). For example, previous studies suggested that fish passes such as by-pass channels may be used as habitat by this benthic species (although the effectiveness of these constructions as a fish pass facility for the bullhead remained unclear because of methodological constraints like ineffective capture techniques or limited sample sizes ;Jungwirth 1996;Jansen et al 1999). Consequently, it is tempting to suggest that supercritical water velocities in O6 (and O7) prevented free upstream passage of this benthic species.…”
Section: Fish Pass Effectiveness For Bullheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instream barriers that are constructed along rivers, such as causeways, weirs and dams/impoundments, contribute to the general disturbance of the typical longitudinal nature of river systems (Jansen et al, 1999) and impede the passage of migrating fish species (Meixler et al, 2009). Globally the fragmentation of rivers has been identified as the primary driver of population decline for many migratory fishes (Masters et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%