2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish bone chemistry and ultrastructure: implications for taphonomy and stable isotope analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
172
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
2
172
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature review of percentage ash values for acellular and cellular fish bone (N>20 species for each bone type; M.D., J. W. C. Dunlop and R.S., in preparation) suggests that a lower mineral content is a consistent feature of cellular bone (~50% ash) relative to acellular bone (~58% ash); these differences are also evident in Toppe et al's (Toppe et al, 2007) comparison of several acellular and cellular species. Furthermore, compared with amniote bones, which have ~61-74% dry ash content (Currey, 2008;Szpak, 2011), fish bones are in general less well mineralized (Biltz and Pellegrino, 1969;Lees, 1987a;Szpak, 2011;Toppe et al, 2007) (Fig.7B). This supports theoretical conjectures that mineral is less tightly packed among collagen fibrils in fish bone relative to mammalian bone (Lees et al, 1984;Lees, 1987a;Lees, 1987b), but the reasons for the differences among fish species are unclear; a much wider array of species must be studied to understand this feature in a phylogenetic context and studies correlating bulk tissue mineral density and nanoscale mineral packing would be very instructive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review of percentage ash values for acellular and cellular fish bone (N>20 species for each bone type; M.D., J. W. C. Dunlop and R.S., in preparation) suggests that a lower mineral content is a consistent feature of cellular bone (~50% ash) relative to acellular bone (~58% ash); these differences are also evident in Toppe et al's (Toppe et al, 2007) comparison of several acellular and cellular species. Furthermore, compared with amniote bones, which have ~61-74% dry ash content (Currey, 2008;Szpak, 2011), fish bones are in general less well mineralized (Biltz and Pellegrino, 1969;Lees, 1987a;Szpak, 2011;Toppe et al, 2007) (Fig.7B). This supports theoretical conjectures that mineral is less tightly packed among collagen fibrils in fish bone relative to mammalian bone (Lees et al, 1984;Lees, 1987a;Lees, 1987b), but the reasons for the differences among fish species are unclear; a much wider array of species must be studied to understand this feature in a phylogenetic context and studies correlating bulk tissue mineral density and nanoscale mineral packing would be very instructive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although quantitative data on herring bone-density measurements have not been conducted, their bones are notably smaller and more delicate relative to most other measured fish species (88). Moreover, the cellular structure of herring bone likely makes them more susceptible to microbial degeneration relative to other fish (89), indicating this species would likely be less well-preserved in the archaeological record.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydroxyproline is a major component of collagen (190) and plays a key role in maintaining collagen stability (191). Hydroxyproline is present in only few proteins apart from collagen, making it a sensitive and specific marker for collagen detection.…”
Section: Quantifications Of Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%