2003
DOI: 10.1258/002221503322113058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish bone as a foreign body

Abstract: Fish bones are one of the most common foreign bodies in the upper aero-digestive tract. The use of plain X-ray in identifying fish bones has questionable value. We believe that the knowledge of the type of the fish ingested improves the diagnostic value of the neck X-rays. This study was designed to evaluate the relative radio-densities of the bones of commonly eaten fish in the UK. Twenty-three species of fish were studied and their bones were grouped into three depending upon their ratio-densities. This info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The plain radiograph is an unreliable tool in the diagnosis of ingested fish bone, as the degree of radio-opacity of the bone varies with the species of fish (15,16). This is in contrast to the chicken bone, which is almost always radio-opaque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plain radiograph is an unreliable tool in the diagnosis of ingested fish bone, as the degree of radio-opacity of the bone varies with the species of fish (15,16). This is in contrast to the chicken bone, which is almost always radio-opaque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,12] This problem has been illustrated in studies of fish bone ingestion showing that the degree of radiopacity of the bone depends on the species of fish. [13,14] In contrast, chicken bones are almost always radiopaque. Even when fish bones are sufficiently radiopaque to be visualized on radiographs, large soft-tissue masses and fluid can obscure the minimal calcium content of the bone, particularly in altered or obese patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a plain X-ray is unreliable in the diagnosis of ingested fi sh bones because the degree of radio-opacity of the bone varies with the species of fi sh. 8,9 A CT scan has been shown to be more helpful in detecting ingested fi sh bones. 10,11 It often reveals a linear calcifi ed body corresponding to a bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%