2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish assemblage changes along a trophic gradient induced by agricultural activities (Santa Lucía, Uruguay)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, at the catchment scale, the topography and land use/cover within a catchment may affect water-source supply and nutrient and sediment inflow (Omernik 2004;Wang et al 2006), and influence the distributions and abundance of stream fishes thereafter (Allan 2004;Wang et al 2006;Lange et al 2014). Numerous researchers have documented the correlations between stream fish assemblages and forest cover (Jones et al 1999;Sutherland et al 2002), farmland use (Heitke et al 2006;Chalar et al 2013) and urbanization (Weaver & Garman 1994;Morgan & Cushman 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at the catchment scale, the topography and land use/cover within a catchment may affect water-source supply and nutrient and sediment inflow (Omernik 2004;Wang et al 2006), and influence the distributions and abundance of stream fishes thereafter (Allan 2004;Wang et al 2006;Lange et al 2014). Numerous researchers have documented the correlations between stream fish assemblages and forest cover (Jones et al 1999;Sutherland et al 2002), farmland use (Heitke et al 2006;Chalar et al 2013) and urbanization (Weaver & Garman 1994;Morgan & Cushman 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trophic guilds of the ten representative species also were not related to the ecoregion; omnivores and carnivores or invertivores were found across regions. Other studies have shown that trophic guilds change longitudinally (Vannote et al 1980) and with increasing degradation, such that species with specialized diets (e.g., carnivores, invertivores, herbivores) decrease, while those fish with generalized diets (i.e., omnivores) increase (Quist et al 2005;Pont et al 2006;Schmutz et al 2007;Chalar et al 2013). Goldstein and Meador (2004) found, however, that the high frequency of invertivores remained constant even as stream size increased, thus demonstrating the variability of trophic responses and the potential role of the flood-pulse concept in providing food sources to large floodplain rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Water quality and habitat structure are essential local factors for determining fish distribution (Pinto et al 2009). Fish have been shown to be sensitive indicators of water quality (Chalar et al 2013); community condition is variously associated with water quality parameters, such as water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, total dissolved solids, nitrogen, and phosphorus (Meador and Goldstein 2003;Hering et al 2006;Pinto et al 2009). Fish also respond negatively to heavy metal concentrations, either dissolved or within sediments, and total suspended solids (Griffith et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degraded water condition at river downstream was dominated by Barilius pakistanicus which has omnivore feeding habit and was tolerant to degradations of environmental conditions like high nutrient loadings and conductivity. Disturbed water quality often favors the occurrence of omnivore individuals as they are more tolerant of degradation (Chalar et al, 2013). Omnivore fauna has the diverse feeding habits and relies on diverse sources for their food which make them tolerant to degrading ecosystem (Das and Chakarbarty, 2007).…”
Section: Impact Of Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%