1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90150-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on cobalt and ruthenium. Metal dispersion and support effects on reaction rate and selectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 511 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the catalytic activity normalized to the level of dispersion was almost constant among all the Ru-modified catalysts. This result indicates that the site-time yields over the Co catalysts were independent of the metal dispersion, and that the nature of the active sites on the catalysts is likely unchanged, which is also consistent with the findings of Iglesia et al [6]. Our previous work [17] suggested that, during the coimpregnation catalyst preparation process, the interaction between Co and Mn species enhances Co dispersion and therefore FT synthesis activity.…”
Section: Effect Of Noble Metal Addition and Impregnation Ordersupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the catalytic activity normalized to the level of dispersion was almost constant among all the Ru-modified catalysts. This result indicates that the site-time yields over the Co catalysts were independent of the metal dispersion, and that the nature of the active sites on the catalysts is likely unchanged, which is also consistent with the findings of Iglesia et al [6]. Our previous work [17] suggested that, during the coimpregnation catalyst preparation process, the interaction between Co and Mn species enhances Co dispersion and therefore FT synthesis activity.…”
Section: Effect Of Noble Metal Addition and Impregnation Ordersupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Co-based catalysts are the most widely applied for this reaction since they exhibit higher activity and selectivity and thus are more economical [3,4]. It is generally accepted that the activity of Co catalysts for FT synthesis depends OPEN ACCESS on the presence of surface-exposed Co metal atoms [5,6], and therefore Co species should be both highly dispersed and reduced on the catalyst surface. For this reason, Co is generally deposited on high surface area supports such as SiO2 [7][8][9][10][11], Al2O3 [12,13] and TiO2 [14,15], in order to increase the quantity of active Co metal species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding active metal, the production of commercial fuels from syngas is mostly based on supported Co catalysts. Iglesia et al established that neither the nature of the support nor the dispersion of Co particles influenced turnover frequency (TOF) of these catalysts, but it was proportional to the concentration of active sites on the surface [4][5][6]. Johnson et al [7] agree with the fact that TOF was not affected by dispersion, although CO conversion seemed to be strongly dependent on Co reducibility.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Numerous studies have been devoted to gain an understanding of the effect of the support and Co structure on the catalytic performance. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The precise influence of the catalyst variables remains unclear.T he effect of the Co particles ize on the activity and selectivity is still under debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%