2009
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1690.1781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Shocks and Real Rigidities

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior mean of the calvo parameter (ϑ = 0.74) is estimated slightly higher than in a recent study by Smets and Wouters (2007), who estimated it at about (ϑ = 0.66). However, the relatively high estimate of the price stickiness parameter is consistent with a characteristic of the DSGE model pointed out by Furlanetto and Seneca (2009): the DSGE model employed obeys many real frictions, which are present in the DSGE model of Smets and Wouters (2007). Once those real rigidities were included, the resulting nominal frictions would have been estimated at lower values.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The posterior mean of the calvo parameter (ϑ = 0.74) is estimated slightly higher than in a recent study by Smets and Wouters (2007), who estimated it at about (ϑ = 0.66). However, the relatively high estimate of the price stickiness parameter is consistent with a characteristic of the DSGE model pointed out by Furlanetto and Seneca (2009): the DSGE model employed obeys many real frictions, which are present in the DSGE model of Smets and Wouters (2007). Once those real rigidities were included, the resulting nominal frictions would have been estimated at lower values.…”
Section: Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In Furlanetto and Seneca (2009), we show that real rigidities (in the form of habit persistence, firm-specific capital and Kimball demand curves) can dramatically reduce the percentage of ROT consumers in the model. We can obtain the same consumption multiplier as in GLV (2007) with only 25% of constrained agents, instead of 50%, and two quarters of price stickiness, instead of four.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Models with ROT agents have difficulty in generating hump-shaped responses and the introduction of habit persistence is not sufficient to generate these effects (cf. Seneca, 2009 andCaldara andKamps, 2008). In the third case, we use a rather aggressive rule with no interest rate smoothing (in this case r r equal to 0, f p equal to 2 and f y equal to 0.6, dotted line).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erceg, Guerrieri, and Gust (2006) in their Sigma model calibrate the share of RT consumers at 50% in order to replicate the dynamic performance of the Federal Reserve Board Global Model. Galì, López‐Salido, and Vallés (2007) as well as Furlanetto and Seneca (2009) show that RT consumers can rationalize the empirically observed response of aggregate consumption to public spending shocks. In Furlanetto and Seneca (2011), the RT hypothesis helps to account for recent empirical evidence on productivity shocks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%