2017
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Rules and Government Borrowing Costs: International Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 As defined by the IMF (2017), "A fiscal rule is a long-lasting constraint on fiscal policy through numerical limits on budgetary aggregates." Hall and Sargent (2015) study the effectiveness of federal debt limits in the U.S. Poterba and Rueben (1999) study the effectiveness of fiscal rules in U.S. states and Thornton and Vasilakis (2017) study the effectiveness across countries. D 'Erasmo et al (2016) summarize work on debt sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 As defined by the IMF (2017), "A fiscal rule is a long-lasting constraint on fiscal policy through numerical limits on budgetary aggregates." Hall and Sargent (2015) study the effectiveness of federal debt limits in the U.S. Poterba and Rueben (1999) study the effectiveness of fiscal rules in U.S. states and Thornton and Vasilakis (2017) study the effectiveness across countries. D 'Erasmo et al (2016) summarize work on debt sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has also been confirmed for developing countries (Tapsoba 2012). The adoption of numerical fiscal rules reduces government borrowing costs (Thornton and Vasilakis 2018), and fiscal rules significantly affect the composition of public spending (Vinturis 2023).…”
Section: The Macroeconomic Effects Of National Fiscal Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayuso-i-Casals et al, (2009) report that from 1990 to 2005 an increase in the share of government finances covered by numerical fiscal rules led to lower deficits in the EU countries. A number of studies provide arguments to prove that the introduction of fiscal rules contributes to improved fiscal outcomes, for example: they can contribute to a successful fiscal consolidation (Guichard et al, 2007), deficit or debt rules lead to limiting the budget deficit (Debrun et al, 2008) and to a lower cost of debt servicing (Thornton and Vasilakis, 2018); expenditure rules are conducive to a lower primary expenditure (Deroose, Moulin and Wierts, 2006), also by reducing pressure to increase expenditure in case of revenue windfall (Wierts, 2008). In addition, one can find confirmation that their impact is greater if they are based on strong legal foundations, and compliance with them is strictly enforced (Hallerberg, Strauch and von Hagen, 2007).…”
Section: Fiscal Governance Instruments Versus Fiscal Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%