Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand in the U.S. Before, During and Following the Great Recession

Abstract

We examine the effect of federal and subnational fiscal policy on aggregate demand in the U.S. by introducing the fiscal effect (FE) measure. FE can be decomposed into three components. Discretionary FE quantifies the effect of discretionary or legislated policy changes on aggregate demand. Cyclical FE captures the effect of the automatic stabilizers-changes in government taxes and spending arising from the business cycle. Residual FE measures the effect of all changes in government revenues and outlays which cannot be categorized as either discretionary or cyclical; for example, it captures the effect of the secular increase in entitlement program spending due to the aging of the population. We use FE to examine the contribution of fiscal policy to growth in real GDP over the course of the Great Recession and current expansion. We compare this contribution to the contributions to growth in aggregate demand made by fiscal policy over past business cycles. In doing so, we highlight that the relatively strong support of government policy to GDP growth during the Great Recession was followed by a historically weak contribution over the course of the current expansion. NOTE:The analysis and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the research staff or the Board of Governors. References to this publications should be cleared with the author(s) given its preliminary status.

Heterogeneous Government Spending Multipliers in the Era Surrounding the Great Recession

“…The scaled federal shocks should also accommodate the possible concern that balanced budget requirements at the state level influence the results. States with stricter budget requirements, for example, might in general react differently to fiscal conditions than other states (Poterba, 1994;Bohn & Inman, 1996), while Cashin et al (2017) find a sharp reduction in state and local government purchases in the postcrisis recovery due to balanced budget rules. A strict budget requirement may also make government spending of an individual state sensitive to changes in state output within one quarter, which would be at odds with our baseline Blanchard and Perotti (2002) identifying assumption.…”

Stuck in neutral? Federalism, policy instruments, and counter-cyclical responses to COVID-19 in the United States

“…Between 2009 and 2012, Congress expanded its patchwork of relief programs, with the largest shares of fiscal support devoted to a payroll tax cut and extensions to unemployment insurance (Council of Economic Advisers, 2014). Despite the persistence of high unemployment, federal fiscal policy turned contractionary between 2011 and 2014 as emergency discretionary policies expired, representing a major departure from prior economic recoveries (Cashin, Lenney, Lutz, & Peterman, 2017).…”

How Effective is Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound? Identification Through Industry Heterogeneity

“…The authors estimate the output effects of government purchases using the Smets-Wouters model, and find maximum effects of 0.3% of GDP in 2009:Q3. Following the end of the Great Recession, fiscal policy was unprecedentedly contractionary (Cashin et al, 2016). 39 I thus control for fiscal policy by constructing an industry-level measure of the effects of government spending in a similar to manner to the approach for measuring interest rate sensitivity.…”